Hi Gabriel,
there are several components which are in need of an overhaul,
especially Javascript heavy implementations like modal window and
autocomplete.
Before we have decided on these, I'm reluctant to shove more code into
the framework.
>It would be very nice to use a TreeProvider instea
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Johan Compagner wrote:
> hmm i use EGit but some how i always get "not authorized" if i try to push
> something
> I am quite sure the username/password is correct, but will recheck it, i
> use this url:
>
> https://jcompag...@git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket.
I would love to have a refactor of the Treegrid (see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1600 WICKET-1600 ) implemented
with the http://code.google.com/p/wicket-tree/ wicket-tree implementation
Sven Meier has done.
It would be very nice to use a TreeProvider instead of the swing TreeNo
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Johan Compagner wrote:
> hmm i use EGit but some how i always get "not authorized" if i try to push
> something
> I am quite sure the username/password is correct, but will recheck it, i
> use this url:
>
> https://jcompag...@git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket.
hmm i use EGit but some how i always get "not authorized" if i try to push
something
I am quite sure the username/password is correct, but will recheck it, i
use this url:
https://jcompag...@git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket.git
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 19:26, Jeremy Thomerson
wrote:
> On
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <
jer...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Clint Checketts wrote:
>
>> Jeremy,
>>
>> Will Git development mimic the current subversion workflow, or will we see
>> we see a more Git-ish way like 'git flow'? See-
>> ht
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Let discuss (again) what will be included in Wicket 6.0 so we can
> schedule what and when will be implemented.
>
> Here is how I see it:
> - use JQuery as backing library - already in master/trunk
> - rework Wicket Ajax to use even
also note that for some clones "trunk" is still the default branch. be
sure to 'git checkout master' which is where 6.0 stuff lives.
-igor
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Igor Vaynberg
> wrote:
>> not sure if git://git.apache.org/wicke
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> not sure if git://git.apache.org/wicket.git is kept up with commits to
> git-wip-us
This is what one of the INFRA members said but later we realized that
these mirrors doesn't work at the moment against WIP repo.
Users can use http://git
i think for users its fine to git clone
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket.git
-igor
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> not sure if git://git.apache.org/wicket.git is kept up with commits to
> git-wip-us
>
> i think for users
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:04
not sure if git://git.apache.org/wicket.git is kept up with commits to
git-wip-us
i think for users
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> The most important info is missing - the checkout url! :-)
>
> For devs:
> https://your_apache_usern...@git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/as
Hi,
Let discuss (again) what will be included in Wicket 6.0 so we can
schedule what and when will be implemented.
Here is how I see it:
- use JQuery as backing library - already in master/trunk
- rework Wicket Ajax to use event registration instead of inline
attributes (like onclick, onchange, ..
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> The most important info is missing - the checkout url! :-)
>
> For devs:
> https://your_apache_usern...@git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket.git
If you set up the .netrc like the git @ apache document states, you
should not provide your
The most important info is missing - the checkout url! :-)
For devs:
https://your_apache_usern...@git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket.git
For users:
git://git.apache.org/wicket.git
or
https://github.com/apache/wicket
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20,
14 matches
Mail list logo