Pull request for Wicket Site

2016-12-12 Thread Joachim Rohde
Hi, I opened a pull request for Wicket Site several weeks ago (https://github.com/apache/wicket-site/pull/8). Could anybody with sufficient permission have a look at it and accept or decline it? Joachim

Wicket 8 Migration Guide - AbstractReadOnlyModel is deprecated

2016-11-04 Thread Joachim Rohde
I just migrated a small application (~100 classes) from Wicket 7.5.0 to Wicket 8.0.0-M2. The migration itself worked flawlessly. The only thing that I missed in the migration guide (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Migration+to+Wicket+8.0) was a hint that AbstractReadOnlyModel

Re: [wicketstuff] Can't we get rid of the distinction between JDK-versions on the folder level?

2015-08-31 Thread Joachim Rohde
-8-oracle Maybe it's a problem with OpenJDK. (Only reason I use OpenJDK 7, is the fact, that it was still installed and before using toolchains I was not in the need of a JDK 7). Joachim On 08/31/2015 07:39 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote: On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Joachim Rohde

Re: [wicketstuff] Can't we get rid of the distinction between JDK-versions on the folder level?

2015-08-30 Thread Joachim Rohde
-version Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Joachim Rohde mailingl...@joachimrohde.com wrote: Hi, As I already mentioned the other day I was porting some changes from master branch to the wicket-6.x branch ( http

Re: [wicketstuff] Can't we get rid of the distinction between JDK-versions on the folder level?

2015-07-31 Thread Joachim Rohde
On 05/17/2015 02:58 PM, Joachim Rohde wrote: I would change both branches. If only one branch is changed nothing would change (regarding the cherry picking). Joachim On 05/17/2015 02:23 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote: Hi Joachim, What is your plan? Make the change only in master or also in wicket

[wicketstuff] Can't we get rid of the distinction between JDK-versions on the folder level?

2015-05-06 Thread Joachim Rohde
Hi, As I already mentioned the other day I was porting some changes from master branch to the wicket-6.x branch (http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicketstuff-Need-help-with-cherry-picking-td4670615.html) and had some trouble doing so, since Git was not able to cherry-pick my changes

Re: [wicketstuff] Need help with cherry-picking

2015-05-05 Thread Joachim Rohde
, Joachim Rohde mailingl...@joachimrohde.com wrote: Hi guys, I need some help with Git. I made some changes to the gmap3-project on the master branch which I wanted to cherry-pick to the wicket-6.x branch. While the project resides in the jdk-1.7-parent folder on the master branch, it's located

[wicketstuff] Need help with cherry-picking

2015-05-04 Thread Joachim Rohde
Hi guys, I need some help with Git. I made some changes to the gmap3-project on the master branch which I wanted to cherry-pick to the wicket-6.x branch. While the project resides in the jdk-1.7-parent folder on the master branch, it's located in the jdk-1.6-parent folder when I'm on the

[Wicketstuff] Am I allowed to break the API on the 6.x-branch?

2015-04-28 Thread Joachim Rohde
Hi, by coincidence I realized that a few examples in the Wicketstuff project GMap3 are broken (e.g. the marker examples). While I was starting to fix those issues I realized that Google removed quite a lot of properties (like shadows for markers

Re: [Wicketstuff] Am I allowed to break the API on the 6.x-branch?

2015-04-28 Thread Joachim Rohde
/constructors. Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Joachim Rohde mailingl...@joachimrohde.com wrote: Hi, by coincidence I realized that a few examples in the Wicketstuff project GMap3 are broken (e.g. the marker examples

Re: Wicketstuff JavaDoc

2015-03-01 Thread Joachim Rohde
Yes, they are generated each night between 11 and 12 p.m. (CET). I setted up the Jenkins just the same week as Martin was setting up travis-ci.org. But since the travis-ci instance is just building and deploying, in comparison to the Jenkins instance which is also running Findbugs, CPD, PMD,

Re: Wicketstuff JavaDoc

2015-03-01 Thread Joachim Rohde
There is already a Jenkins instance running which builds nightly WicketStuff and along with it JavaDocs (and some other stuff): http://37.120.169.104/jenkins/job/wicketstuff/site/ Joachim On 02/28/2015 03:23 PM, Andrea Del Bene wrote: Hi everybody, I've created a gh-pages branch to host

Failure of Kyro serializer due to latest changes in Wicket snapshot?

2014-10-16 Thread Joachim Rohde
Hi, I realized today that the unit tests of the Kryo serializers (and the fast serializer) in the Wickestuff project were failing since (at least) yesterday (16th october). The last successful build according to https://travis-ci.org/wicketstuff/core/builds was on the 13th. For example

Re: svn commit: r1553899 - in /wicket/common/site/trunk/_site/guide/guide: chapter26.html chapter4.html pages/chapter4_3.html single.html single.pdf src/docs/guide/chapter4/chapter4_3.gdoc

2013-12-29 Thread Joachim Rohde
Hi Martin, I guess he accidentally changed his keyboard-layout and just meant by instead of bz. Joachim On 12/29/2013 10:06 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote: Hi Andrea, On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 9:46 PM, adelb...@apache.org wrote: Author: adelbene Date: Sat Dec 28 19:46:29 2013 New Revision:

Re: Ẁicketstuff - projects in the master branch which are not included in the pom

2012-08-11 Thread Joachim Rohde
- because you don't know when someone would volunteer to migrate it. On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Joachim Rohde mailingl...@joachimrohde.com wrote: Hello, while I was working on the wicketstuff project I realized that the master branch contains a lot of projects which are not referenced

Ẁicketstuff - projects in the master branch which are not included in the pom

2012-08-09 Thread Joachim Rohde
Hello, while I was working on the wicketstuff project I realized that the master branch contains a lot of projects which are not referenced in the POM (e.g. artworks, ddcalendar, syringe, etc.). Those projects are also not in the out-commented section because they still need to be ported to