Re: About the coupling between design and code

Hello Radev, > I've also developed some applications with Lotus, and there the abstraction > between the design and the code is bound only by the name of the elements. > There is no need to know anything about nesting of the elements. Such > decoupling between the design and code could make th

[Fwd: Re: Id on Components]

factories instances and you delay the actual component creation until you know the id. -Matej On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Korbinian Bachl - privat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Matej, sorry for this noobish question, but could you please give me an example of your "factories"

Re: Id on Components

just store factories instances and you delay the actual component creation until you know the id. -Matej On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Korbinian Bachl - privat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Matej, sorry for this noobish question, but could you please give me an example of your "fact

Re: Id on Components

Hi Matej, sorry for this noobish question, but could you please give me an example of your "factories" idea? Best, Korbinian Matej Knopp schrieb: On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Korbinian Bachl - privat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks for clear answer; In case i

Re: Id on Components

great News! Thx, Korbinian Johan Compagner schrieb: Configuring the prefix wicket is something on my todo for 1.5 On 4/12/08, Korbinian Bachl - privat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks for clear answer; In case i I add a feature request: would it even be possible to change the I

Re: Id on Components

titem? Martijn On 4/12/08, Korbinian Bachl - privat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks for clear answer; In case i I add a feature request: would it even be possible to change the Id at a later time? I catch me regularly to add Components like Links, Panels etc. to a List and have them render

Re: Id on Components

ating conflicts. On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Korbinian Bachl - privat < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, short question: Why isn't it possible to have a setId(String id) on the components? - Is it really necessary that they know their id at creation-time? Regards, Korbinian

Re: Id on Components

Thanks for clear answer; In case i I add a feature request: would it even be possible to change the Id at a later time? I catch me regularly to add Components like Links, Panels etc. to a List and have them rendered later on to different Markups in different ListViews - and that means I need t

Id on Components

Hi, short question: Why isn't it possible to have a setId(String id) on the components? - Is it really necessary that they know their id at creation-time? Regards, Korbinian

Re: ModalWindow + Submit

Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael schrieb: I guess he could also solve this by having one constructor for ajax and another for non ajax in his panel.. That would mean only one panel.. It depends on what he wants.. Wicket in a nutshell letting OO concerns up to you:) well, thats the t

Re: ModalWindow + Submit

Vazquez Wael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Korbinian Bachl - privat wrote: Hello, I've noticed that a Form inside a ModalWindow can't be submitted using the onSubmit function (and dislikes a standard submit button) but instead requires an AjaxButton to call the action - why is this

Re: ModalWindow + Submit

I think it would be even better to wrap the panel nino is talking about in a new page for your modal window. Maurice On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Korbinian Bachl - privat wrote: Hello, I've noticed t

ModalWindow + Submit

Hello, I've noticed that a Form inside a ModalWindow can't be submitted using the onSubmit function (and dislikes a standard submit button) but instead requires an AjaxButton to call the action - why is this so? It makes my life currently somehow hard as I need 2 nearly identical forms - one

AjaxLink/ AjaxFallbackLink ?

Hello, wicket has two AjaxLinks: AjaxLink + AjaxFallbackLink Why are those 2 needed? IMHO the behaviour of the AjaxFallbacklink should be the same as AjaxLink (degrade if no JS is available) and I wonder if in wicket 1.4 AjaxLink could degrade by default and AjaxFallbackLink could be made @d

wicket-contrib-yui

Hello, as YUI is now with 2.4.1 more mature as it was some time ago when I had been at it a bit I took a look at it today. I made some bigger changes (the last changes to it were months ago) like getting rid of the old 2.3.0, 2.2.X and 2.3.1 branches and finally fixed the HeaderContributor (

Re: Wicket + JS / CSS resources - idea for 1.4

pretty the webstandard) Best, Korbinian johan On Feb 6, 2008 10:33 AM, Korbinian Bachl - privat < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ok, johan, thanks for the info about that - now, im not 100% sure if this then may work but couldnt we allow the developer to at least define a List default

Re: Wicket + JS / CSS resources - idea for 1.4

ave 1 or more css. Thats all pretty much completely dynamic. We have no idea what is really coming. I could go over every possible tab there is and gather every css but then the first hit to the applicaiton would maybe download more then 1MB for the first time johan On Feb 5, 2008 6:52 PM

Re: Wicket + JS / CSS resources - idea for 1.4

/) * use the normal wicket feature to cache Disclaimer : I'm the author of yuicompressor-maven-plugin /davidB Korbinian Bachl - privat wrote: Hello, some time age there was a thread where sb. had problems because they used more CSS references (in their pages combined of many panels) than t

Re: Wicket + JS / CSS resources - idea for 1.4

uld do that with js. then just wicket.jar and wicket extentions.jarwould result in a file that would be all the stuff from the basic event/ajax to the modal stuff in one file? Then we just hope that some where it wouldn't conflict.. johan On Feb 5, 2008 12:33 PM, Korbinian Bachl - privat

Wicket + JS / CSS resources - idea for 1.4

Hello, some time age there was a thread where sb. had problems because they used more CSS references (in their pages combined of many panels) than the IE would actually load in the end (some limit of around 30 I think). Today I surfed to theserverside.com and this one cathced my interest: ht

Re: Something about Design

Hello Ahmed, Drupal is a CMS similar to Typo3 & co while wicket is a Java Web Framework, similar in term to what Zend Framework is to PHP. So they share nothing real in common - or did I get you wrong? there has been a CMS called Kronos based on wicket but I dont know what happened to it.

Re: Wicket-Spring RC2/ Spring 2.5 Annot problem/ Bug?

happy new year, Korbinian Timo Rantalaiho schrieb: On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Korbinian Bachl wrote: Did I do something wrong here or can it be that SpringBean doesnt work with annotation configured spring beans? It does, there must be some other Spring configuration error. You're better

Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 final

Here you are: Compilation of sources using maven install in /src (did a complete local maven repo clean before). result: [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Reactor Summary: [INFO]

Wicket-Spring RC2/ Spring 2.5 Annot problem/ Bug?

Hi, i get org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: No bean named 'foo' is defined when defining a Bean like this: @Component("foo") public class someDAO {... and in XML: while if defining that way: public class someDAO {... XML: works. Wicket Java is: public

Re: 1.4 Wish List

Hi Eelco, Eelco Hillenius schrieb: Add Rapid Prototyping Forms The Idea of Alistair Maw and Jonathan Locke (ROR? No. Wicket on Wheels.) should be included in next Wicket. A set of nice looking Defaultformcomponents and a Beanresolver to automatically let create forms from just the plain bean bu

1.4 Wish List

Hi, i added following items to it: (http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Wicket+1.4+Wish+List) Add Rapid Prototyping Forms The Idea of Alistair Maw and Jonathan Locke (ROR? No. Wicket on Wheels.) should be included in next Wicket. A set of nice looking Defaultformcomponents and a

Re: Future of the wicketframework.org domain

i find this idea nice, too Regards, Korbinian PS: if the cost of the domain is an issue, then dump me an email and ill pay these bucks - 10 euro / year is not an issue regarding a great piece of software IMHO... Bruno Borges schrieb: I'd like to suggest to turn wicketframework.org into a

Re: Some question about wicket ajax

", new ArrayList()) { public void onPopulateItem(ListItem item) {} }); it gives output: if i have a list with 1 item it gives item so why isnt the UL then a valid hook? Best, Korbinian Matej Knopp schrieb: On 10/31/07, Korbinian Bachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Mat

Re: Some question about wicket ajax

re replacing. Since listview itself has no body, you need a > container above it. this is something I understand for RepeatingView, but not for ListView - where you have an enclosing tag which is put around all repeated content? Thanks for your time to answer these questions, Korbinian

Re: Some question about wicket ajax

, Korbinian Bachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, after creating yet another WebMarkupContainer to allow a ajaxified resultset, i wondered why we are forced to this? - I mean, im not a JS guru, but why do we have to create abstract containers to let some content change? I know that we need a hook (

Some question about wicket ajax

Hi, after creating yet another WebMarkupContainer to allow a ajaxified resultset, i wondered why we are forced to this? - I mean, im not a JS guru, but why do we have to create abstract containers to let some content change? I know that we need a hook (namely an tag with id) but couldnt this

moving from Beta3 to Beta4, addComponentInstantiationListener

Hi, in my init() i used the addComponentInstantiationListener for loading the wicket-contrib-javaee ejb3 bridge, but this is now broken, as @Override protected void init() { addComponentInstantiationListener(new JavaEEComponentInjector(this)); . is not valid anymore - i

Re: Modification Watcher Task Log

in my log: [8/24/07 12:21:05:226 EDT] 702c702c SystemOut O DEBUG <2007-08-24 12:21:05,226> [ModificationWatcher Task] - Run the job: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is this similar to what you reported here? Thanks! Korbinian Bachl wrote: Hi, i've noticed that in 1.3.0 you get repeat

Re: Modification Watcher Task Log

done: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-883 Igor Vaynberg schrieb: yes please -igor On 8/23/07, Korbinian Bachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: tried now the build from 23.08.2007 - same problem here :( - should I file a bug in JIRA ? Igor Vaynberg schrieb: try the latest

Re: Modification Watcher Task Log

tried now the build from 23.08.2007 - same problem here :( - should I file a bug in JIRA ? Igor Vaynberg schrieb: try the latest trunk -igor On 8/23/07, Korbinian Bachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, i've noticed that in 1.3.0 you get repeatedly 13864 [ModificationWatcher

Re: wicket JMX

Hi Gerolf, short follow up question: after playing for some hours with JMX im really lovin it... who needs xml-resources when you jut can have a MBean with a default value and edit it during runtime! the only thing that now comes to me if there is any management console existant that can be e

Modification Watcher Task Log

Hi, i've noticed that in 1.3.0 you get repeatedly 13864 [ModificationWatcher Task] ERROR org.apache.wicket.util.resource.UrlResourceStream 's wich really pollutes the logfiles. Im using the 1.3.0 Snapshot Daily from 19th August, and get every second at leas one of these errors in the logs..

Re: wicket JMX

Hi, did have a look at it, but thats quite useless there, as im on an appserver while the pure start is only for situations where you dont have any server at all - this is, because the MBeansever etc. is already existant and no container is required. (in fact, as wicket-jmx has its own initi

wicket JMX

Hi, i downloaded wicket-jmx and put it into the classpath of a new wicket-skeleton app - I then deployed it to GF V5 b50g and logged into the management console, but no MBeans were displayed... do I need to register it anywhere or did I miss sth? - Beside Eelcos post (chillenious blog 2006) t

<    1   2