Re: Upgrade spring dependency to 3.0-latest prior to 1.5 final?

2011-02-17 Thread Maarten Bosteels
-1 for updating to spring 3 (especially when wicket-spring doesn't need features not available in 2.5.6) How about [2.5.6,) ? It clearly indicates that 2.5.6 is the minimum required version for wicket-spring http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Dependency+Mediation+and+Conflict+Resolution#D

Re: [Vote] Move wicket-velocity to wicketstuff

2011-06-15 Thread Maarten Bosteels
We are planning to use wicket-velocity and we will post bugs when we find them ;-) I would prefer if it stayed where it is now and follows the same release cycle as wicket core. Non binding of course. Maarten On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:43 PM, James Carman wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:40

Re: source/commits in jira

2012-02-12 Thread Maarten Bosteels
Or you could just create one JIRA ticket that you never close and use it in the commit messages for all the minor fixes. It doesn't even have to be in JIRA: you could use eg. WICKET-000 for this. On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Johan Compagner wrote: > That could be tricky, because not all commi

Re: Apache Wicket 1.5.8 is released

2012-09-04 Thread Maarten Bosteels
Congratulations with the new release. I guess it would be best if 1.5.8 was added to the dropdown box (and become the default option) on http://wicket.apache.org/start/quickstart.html regards Maarten On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote: > This is the eighth maintenance releas

Re: new wicket extensions

2012-12-23 Thread Maarten Bosteels
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Nick Pratt wrote: > Jquery-ui vs bootstrap vs another doesn't matter to me - as long as I can > get something functional as soon as I can and then worry about tweaking > components later on > +1

Re: Sourceforge page needs to come down

2008-06-03 Thread Maarten Bosteels
I agree, that a large banner pointing to documents for current Wicket version would be a good idea. I also arrived at these old pages via Google, and it took me a while to understand that its' about older versions. regards, Maarten On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Antony Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Confluence (WICKET wiki) rights

2008-06-03 Thread Maarten Bosteels
Hello, I don't know if it's the 'standard Apache' way of doing this, but for Apache MINA it's enough to sign and fax the CLA. Anyone can do this, no need to be an Apache committer. http://www.nabble.com/The-first-step-to-contribute-documentation-td7523270.html#a7523270 regards, Maarten On Tue,

Re: Generics again

2008-06-19 Thread Maarten Bosteels
Hi, I haven't yet tried it out, but I think bean-properties [1] could be really useful for creating a type-safe, refactorable PropertyModel It's basically the same idea as wicket models but applied on a finer-grained level: on object properties instead of objects. I think it's a really cool idea,

Re: [VOTE] End of Life wicket-contrib-gmap?

2008-11-28 Thread Maarten Bosteels
[ X ] - YES, move dead projects to a separate branch That would increase the credibility of the projects that are still alive. Maarten On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > HI Jeremy > > [ X ] - YES, please create a branch in the Wi

Re: Double Submit Bug in Palette?

2009-03-03 Thread Maarten Bosteels
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Michael Mosmann wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 03.03.2009, 08:18 -0800 schrieb Igor Vaynberg: > > quickstart > > what does this mean? http://www.nabble.com/Form-GET-doesn%27t-call-onSubmit-method-td19780009.html#a19785452 Maarten > > > > and jira. > > done. > > m

Re: echo.. echo...

2009-04-15 Thread Maarten Bosteels
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Stuff-commit-access-td23050947.html On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Philip A. Chapman wrote: > The packets are probably getting frozen in the tubez while traveling in > Canada.  I would suggest that you be patient for spring to thaw them out. >  At that point, you sh

Re: Wicketstuff core...

2009-04-18 Thread Maarten Bosteels
I just commented it out. Maarten On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 1:45 PM, James Carman wrote: > Got it.  Thanks.  Now I know who "ThaDon" is. :) > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Craig Tataryn wrote: >> James, no I never did comment out your stuff.  Go for it. >> >> Craig. >> >> On 17-Apr-09, at 9:4

Re: Wicket interest to a Content Technology track in ACUS09?

2009-07-03 Thread Maarten Bosteels
+1 for a session on Brix-CMS Maarten On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Jeremy > Thomerson wrote: > > I will be at ApacheCon US this year and will be presenting a one-day > > training (on Wicket) on Tuesday. I could do a session or tw

Re: True?

2009-10-15 Thread Maarten Bosteels
"clients that had trouble getting Wicket to scale, and they even hired committers to try to fix" Is it a statement about Wicket or about the skills of the 'clients' ? Besides, there is nothing wrong with hiring Wicket committers to help you out, right ? plain FUD Maarten On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at

Re: Writing Wicket ajax debug output to a file!

2010-11-16 Thread Maarten Bosteels
Maybe this list can help : http://ajaxpatterns.org/Javascript_Logging_Frameworks or have a look at http://getfirebug.com/logging On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:34 PM, julien roche AKA indiana_jules < roche@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Maybe with nodejs, you can try to log in a file: http://nodejs.o

Re: Future hosting of wicket stuff

2010-12-16 Thread Maarten Bosteels
Hi Richard, If the wicket related code that you are going to release is a clean, polished project on its own, and you plan to keep supporting it, then I think the project deserves its own hosting, instead of being added to wicket-stuff. There is a lot of cool stuff and useful ideas in wicket-stuf