Re: Immutable git tags for ASF git repo

+1 2016-01-25 17:29 GMT+01:00 Martin Grigorov : > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Martijn Dashorst < > martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On second thought, what about removing the old tags after they have > > been copied to rel/wicket-x.y.z? > > > > +1 > > > > > > Would make checking out

Re: Future of GDoc

aspike-dev/201408.mbox/%3CCAAxZHdd8VQL3CZSwbg9Xeexdm5uevNDwAZ6Hbtvd=Ptkp2=z...@mail.gmail.com%3E > > So this seems to be a good approach. > > Martijn > > On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Martin Funk wrote: >> Hi Martijn, >> >> taking your suggestion, my pick on this

Re: Future of GDoc

Hi Martijn, taking your suggestion, my pick on this can be found here: https://github.com/mafulafunk/wicket/tree/user-guide-6 Most of the contribution can be found in the wicket-user-guide subdir I just dug through the first 4 Chapters, to get my own feel for it. Things that work: -the a

Re: Apache + GitHub step 1

is not very big then just the fact that the >> user created PR is enough to give up her ownership >> if the patch is rather big then Apache requires signed CLA before merging >> the code >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Martin Funk wrote: >> >>

Re: Apache + GitHub step 1

21:44 schrieb Martin Grigorov : > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Martin Funk wrote: > >>> Pull Requests are still not supported. >> But they could be pulled to local and then pushed to the apache repo by >> core commiters, right? >> > > Right, but it invol

Re: Apache + GitHub step 1

> Pull Requests are still not supported. But they could be pulled to local and then pushed to the apache repo by core commiters, right? mf Am 12.02.2014 um 09:52 schrieb Martin Grigorov : > Don't get too excited :) > It is just about mail notifications and comments in JIRA/GitHub. > Pull Reques

Re: GSOC2014 for Wicket ?

Anything, but please don't design by committee. mf Am 06.02.2014 um 14:57 schrieb Martin Grigorov : > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Martijn Dashorst > wrote: > >> A (good) design is a complicated thing... I'd rather have someone from the >> core team implement it, and have it maintain[able|ed

Versions of jetty

Hi, as I worked on a patch to fix the archetypes for wicket 7.x I came across several versions of jetty. Like in the current master it is: › grep -r 'jetty.*version' . ./archetypes/quickstart/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml: 8.1.12.v20130726 ./archetypes/quickstart/src/m

Re: svn commit: r1539466 - /wicket/common/site/trunk/_includes/navigation.html

Is someone going to do the jekyll regenerate? Am 06.11.2013 um 22:23 schrieb adelb...@apache.org: > Author: adelbene > Date: Wed Nov 6 21:22:59 2013 > New Revision: 1539466 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1539466 > Log: > Added a link to the pdf version of the guide into navigation.html > > Mo

Re: wicket pull request: Assert that instance of

e and I cannot decide whether the PR is good or not. >> >> https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/57/commits is another PR from Martin >> Funk that has some improvements to Wicket's unit tests that I'd like to >> merge but I cannot because it depends on PR 56. >&

Re: Autoformatting and eclipse settings

hing in .settings/ describe the change in >> the commit message then I apply the change in my IDEA config. >> >> The problem is not IDEA. The problem is with different versions of Eclipse >> and its plugins. Emond had explained the same problem at >> http://markmail.org/search/?q

Re: eclipse .settings files

ings one could ignore: **.settings/org.eclipse.jdt.core.prefs **.settings/org.eclipse.jdt.ui.prefs I"ll come up with a jira an a patch of the site and the code. mf Am 28.10.2013 um 09:42 schrieb Martin Grigorov : > Hi, > > > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Martin Funk wrot

eclipse .settings files

Hi, did anything evolve out of this discussion: http://markmail.org/search/?q=list%3Aorg.apache.wicket+org.eclipse.jdt.core.prefs#query:list%3Aorg.apache.wicket%20org.eclipse.jdt.core.prefs%20order%3Adate-backward+page:1+mid:uue2s7acqs3h4zuo+state:results currently if one checks out the code and

Re: Oh, so many branches.

all of them we have tags, for the > respective releases. > There are some experimental branches (e.g. with 'sandbox' in their name and > others) - those should stay there. Someone may revive them some day. > > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Martin Funk wrote:

Oh, so many branches.

Hi, something I stumble over form time to time is the sheer number of branches that the git repo is carrying. Is there a reasoning behind that, which I haven't picked up? It is not a big thing just a litte itch every time I try to encourage someone to get closer to wickets codebase. After we do

Re: A newer, flatter design for wicket site

Hi Martijn, all verry nice. Would it be possible to come up with a set of 'powered by' pictures? Those could be used as icons in an web app to show which technologies are used. mf 2013/5/13 Jan Riehn > Hi Martijn, > > I agree with Michael. Maybe you could update the styling for the > depende

Fwd: [3/4] git commit: Start next development version

This commit didn't do what it promised. Still references to 6.5.0-SNAPSHOT left in some pom.xml › grep -R "6.5.0" --include "pom.xml" . ./archetypes/quickstart/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml: 6.5.0-SNAPSHOT ./archetypes/quickstart/target/classes/archetype-resources/pom.xm

Re: [3/4] git commit: Start next development version

settings files? mf Am 23.01.2013 um 12:18 schrieb Martin Funk : > This commit didn't do what it promised. > > Still references to 6.5.0-SNAPSHOT left in some pom.xml > > › grep -R "6.5.0" --include "pom.xml" . > ./archetypes/quic

Re: Moving wicket stuff to github

Before anyone does the svn-git job look at this little helper: https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git https://www.negativetwenty.net/redmine/projects/show/svn2git mf Am 16.12.2010 um 21:37 schrieb Martijn Dashorst: > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Martin Funk > wrote: >> The ot

Re: Moving wicket stuff to github

texas style :-) Am 16.12.2010 um 21:55 schrieb Jeremy Thomerson: > +1 for moving everything. this needs to be "all or nothing" > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Martijn Dashorst < > martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 9:32 PM,

Re: Moving wicket stuff to github

+1 for the easy approach. It is not that huge of a project that it needs to be split up in modules or so. In fact I'd only migrate wicketstuff-core, something like I did about a year ago. https://github.com/wicketpit/wicketstuff-core But ended up in having no fun in merging the new commits that

Re: taking the I out of Interface

Am 04.10.2009 um 20:33 schrieb Erik van Oosten: Martin Grigorov wrote: @Erik: it'd be interesting to be at a course of jWeekend where you'll explain to the attendees "Wicket consists of components, models, ... and the basic model is Locator (and all implementations end with **Model)". I'll

Re: taking the I out of Interface

renaming season? I think Model (interface) / ObjectModel is the best alternative. ObjectModel says enough about the implementation - that it holds a single object. But I don't think this thread is about actual naming. It's more about pros & cons of the prefix. Get rid of IModel, call it Locato

Re: [vote] release 1.4.2

Within the last 10 years SUN, so successfully, ironed into my brain that properties are ISO 8859-1, I wouldn't even dare to thinkt it could be different. see also: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/java/util/Properties.html mf 2009/9/28 Juergen Donnerstag > I think SUNs default is the ch

Re: [vote] release wicket 1.4.0

non binding [x] Yes release 1.4.0 [ ] No, don't release it -igor but please don't forget about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2386 for 1.4.1 :-) mf

Re: Tim Boudreau doesn't like getModel() -> getDefaultModel()

Am 06.07.2009 um 16:18 schrieb Jeremy Thomerson: A good overall read, but he also seemed to miss the reason we have getModel**Object**. He doesn't think that's necessary, but misses that there is also getModel (without object) and the word does clarify the difference. Anyway, a good read on ov

Re: wicket trunk: Compilation failure

yeah, but than its only half of the fun :-) mf Am 22.06.2009 um 19:43 schrieb Igor Vaynberg: if you dont like failures dont svn up off a trunk :) -igor On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Martin Funk wrote: Beyond that compilation failure I noticed that there are two incarnations of

Re: wicket trunk: Compilation failure

09 at 8:32 AM, Juergen Donnerstag wrote: I just did "maven -Dmaven.test.skip=true clean install" and it completed successfully (on 1.4 trunk from 18 hrs ago). -Juergen On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Martin Funk wrote: anyone else bothered by that? mf

wicket trunk: Compilation failure

anyone else bothered by that? mf

AbstractBehavior and AbstractHeaderContributor

Hi, as I'm poking IBehavior I came across AbstractBehavior and its descendent AbstractHeaderContributor Both claim to implement IHeaderContributor. Why is it this way? I poked around further and dropped the IHeaderContributor interface in AbstractBehavior which revealed that quite some Cla

http://git.apache.org/

and wicket is mirrored too :-) just a > git clone git://git.apache.org/wicket.git and wicket was on my drive. Very nice, that's sure get git a little higher up on my list. Did anyone follow the history of that? Are thoes mirrors there to stay, or may they be just a temporry engagement? How abo

Re: [Wicket-autocvs] SF.net SVN: wicket-stuff:[4631] trunk/wicketstuff-core/gmap2-parent/gmap2/ src/main/java/wicket/contrib/gmap/GMap2.java

Am 24.03.2009 um 04:48 schrieb astub...@users.sourceforge.net: Revision: 4631 http://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/wicket-stuff/?rev=4631&view=rev Author: astubbs1 Date: 2009-03-24 03:48:18 + (Tue, 24 Mar 2009) Log Message: --- WSGMAPP-7 - 'GMap2 (wicket-contrib-g

Re: Wicket Stuff commit access

welcome aboard. mf Am 03.03.2009 um 17:24 schrieb Igor Vaynberg: done -igor On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Antony Stubbs wrote: sourceforge account: astubbs1 I want to work on gmap2 and bring wicket-contrib-groovy back to life. Regards, Antony Stubbs, NZ

Re: Git at sf.net

Hi Martijn, interesting toppic. I'm not quite on the edge of the subject of distributed scm's, but the concept is interesting. Just reading about the commit rate of Linus, would be a reason to look a little deeper into that. Though personally I so fare only made experiments with mercurial.

Component.getBehaviors

Hi, why is Components public final List getBehaviors() public and why is protected List getBehaviors(Class type) protected? For example for a Behavior I'd like it to be able to tell if an Behavior of its type is already bound to that component. In its bind() method I'd lik

Re: Teamcity build agent not running?

till there things look fine to me. mf Am 18.02.2009 um 15:51 schrieb Johan Compagner: it is being build now? By core itself? On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 15:41, Martin Funk wrote: wicket contrib gmap2 moved into wicketstuff-core, so I just deleted that TeamCity Build project. mf Am 18.02.

Re: Teamcity build agent not running?

t. For the most part everything builds correctly now* * On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 13:25, Martin Funk wrote: thnx, seems to work now. mf Am 17.02.2009 um 22:32 schrieb Johan Compagner: i will look at that tomorrow Also i think about moving wickestuff to another server (vm) on my

Re: Teamcity build agent not running?

thnx, seems to work now. mf Am 17.02.2009 um 22:32 schrieb Johan Compagner: i will look at that tomorrow Also i think about moving wickestuff to another server (vm) on my own big server in the coming months johan On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 22:21, Martin Funk wrote: Could it be that

Teamcity build agent not running?

Could it be that the build agent on wicketstuff.org is not running correctly? There are no new builds and the queue is full too. http://wicketstuff.org/teamcity/queue.html Can't figure out a reason on first sight though. Martin

Re: Continuum Build Server Set Up

Hi Jeremy, just saw your commits on wicket-stuff. I allways like any attempt to get some more stucture into wicket-stuff. One thing I saw was the licences tag in the pom.xml http://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/wicket-stuff/trunk/pom.xml?revision=4329&view=markup&pathrev=4329 16

Re: Wicket GMap2 and Ajax

I think wicket-ajax.js is choking, because the XMLHttpRequest to google is send while the XMLHttpRequest to the wicket-server, that brought in the script, is still processed. But I'm still debugging, hints are appreciated, Martin Martin Funk wrote: Hi Wicketeers, currentl

Re: Wicket GMap2 and Ajax

t. you mean wireshark? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireshark I never went through its setup so far, but it's on my list. Maybe it's my way of understating things. Tcpmon and firebug, actually make me pretty confident, that the call doesn't leave my machine. mf 2008/10/26

Wicket GMap2 and Ajax

Hi Wicketeers, currently I'm reevaluating http://wicketstuff.org/jira/browse/WSGMAPP-10 couse I'm not so sure if my assumptions were right. But now I got stuck in a place were I'd like to ask for a second view. As it may not be a big surprise GMap2 heavily relies on googles jsapi. In a normal

Re: Wicket 1.5 Ajax

mmunication to the server. So much from me for now & and be patient with my response pace, Martin -Matej On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:31 PM, Martin Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Matej, hi list, I just saw the page that Matej added to the wiki, so I thought it might be wishing time

Wicket 1.5 Ajax

Hi Matej, hi list, I just saw the page that Matej added to the wiki, so I thought it might be wishing time for improving Wicket Ajax now. My wishes are somewhat vague, but I just don't wanna miss the wishing window :-) Sven and I have been happily coding on wicket-contrib-gmap2, which also

Re: Wicket training

Michael Mosmann wrote: Hi, does anybody has some information about wicket training in germany? Michael Mosmann you wanna give, or do you want to receive? I could tell you something about about the Google Maps Panel in wicket-stuff :-) I don't think there is a company in with a prepar

Re: wicket-quickstart

hm... I somehow started to like wicket-quickstart. As much as the archetype is great for show off, setting up a complete wicket app with a maven one liner, the quickstart is nice for comming up with diffs to describe a problem. I'd keep em. mf 2008/3/23, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > s

Re: Nabble double posts -> disable nabble?

2008/3/11, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I didn't notice any problems. You get the exact same posts multiple > times? Do other people experience this as well? > > nope no doubles nor even triplets here, mf

Re: [vote] establish a [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail list

Martijn Dashorst schrieb: With our growing user base there is a need for organizing community f2f meetings and other community related issues, as evidenced by the amount of messages for organizing the Copenhagen meetup. I propose to create a new focused mailing list to give these efforts a breath

Re: WebRequestCodingStrategy inconsistent with its insource documentation

Never mind, I'd say the implentation is correct and the javadoc is good enough. It's probably that on my first reading atempt I got hooked on 'mountsOnPath is sorted by longest paths first to improve resolution of possible path * conflicts. ' which made me expect something like:

Re: how to add wicketstuff projet to bamboo

Frank Bille schrieb: On 10/18/07, Martin Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Metoo! wicket-contrib-gmap2 wicket-contrib-gmap2-examples Sure, let me know a username for bamboo and I'll create you. Frank I'd like to go by the username: funkattack mf

Rss Feed fails was: Re: how to add wicketstuff projet to bamboo

Eelco Hillenius schrieb: Tell us which one it is, and one of the bamboo admins can do it. The RSS feed http://wicketstuff.org/bamboo/rss/createAllBuildsRssFeed.action?feedType=rssAll&buildKey=WICKET1X-WICKET for all builds on http://wicketstuff.org/bamboo/browse/WICKET1X-WICKET fails in that

Re: how to add wicketstuff projet to bamboo

Frank Bille schrieb: Hey, Let me handle it. Is there a pattern to get acceped or is a "metoo" goodenough? Metoo! wicket-contrib-gmap2 wicket-contrib-gmap2-examples Martin Frank On 10/18/07, David Bernard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: wicketstuff-parent wicketstuff-misc wicketstuff-jque

Re: [Fwd: svn commit: r581445 - /wicket/trunk/jdk-1.4/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/link/ExternalLink.java]

agner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: yeah for an external link the model object seems to me like a better choice.. On 10/3/07, Martin Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Igor, looks like you too might have an oppinion on this one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-101

[Fwd: svn commit: r581445 - /wicket/trunk/jdk-1.4/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/link/ExternalLink.java]

Hi Igor, looks like you too might have an oppinion on this one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1016 I'd say a good chance to get rid of an issue in the bug tracker. mf

Re: Contract of Session.attach() and Session.detach()

Eelco Hillenius schrieb: In my current project well fell over this looking at: WicketFilter.getLastModified(final HttpServletRequest servletRequest) where cachable resources lead over Session.findOrCreate to Session.set(Session) to Session.attach() but the Session.unset() doesn't lead to a Ses

Re: Contract of Session.attach() and Session.detach()

Session.findOrCreate to Session.set(Session) to Session.attach() but the Session.unset() doesn't lead to a Session.detach() Martin Martijn Dashorst schrieb: Why do you want a NullPointerException to occur in unset? :-) Martijn On 9/25/07, Martin Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,

Contract of Session.attach() and Session.detach()

Hi, what is the contract of Session.attach() and Session.detach() ? Especially, is it intended that after a call to attach() that there will be at least one call to detach() before the request goes back to the client? If that's the case, then there might be a bug in Session and I propose the f