Re: Future of the wicketframework.org domain

2007-11-05 Thread Bruno Borges
wicketframework.org would not provide useful information but links to the real websites... like opencompositing.org does :) On Nov 5, 2007 3:58 PM, Al Maw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bruno Borges wrote: > > I'd like to suggest to turn wicketframework.org into a front door for > all > > kind of W

Re: Future of the wicketframework.org domain

2007-11-05 Thread Al Maw
Bruno Borges wrote: I'd like to suggest to turn wicketframework.org into a front door for all kind of Wicket information. Link to Wicket Stuff, tutorials, mailing list, Apache's website, etc. With all respect, I completely disagree with this suggestion. ;-) We most certainly do not want to fra

Re: Future of the wicketframework.org domain

2007-11-05 Thread Korbinian Bachl
i find this idea nice, too Regards, Korbinian PS: if the cost of the domain is an issue, then dump me an email and ill pay these bucks - 10 euro / year is not an issue regarding a great piece of software IMHO... Bruno Borges schrieb: I'd like to suggest to turn wicketframework.org into a

Re: Future of the wicketframework.org domain

2007-11-05 Thread Bruno Borges
I'd like to suggest to turn wicketframework.org into a front door for all kind of Wicket information. Link to Wicket Stuff, tutorials, mailing list, Apache's website, etc. If you go to http://www.opencompositing.org/ you will see what I'm talking about. This website is about Compiz, Beryl and eve

Re: Future of the wicketframework.org domain

2007-11-04 Thread Martijn Dashorst
On 11/4/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I meant going yourself, not paying for me! > But i have no problem if somebody is paying for me!! :) Neither do I, but I found the difference between keeping wicketfarmework.org alive (about 10-15 euros per year) in stark contrast to a tic

Re: Future of the wicketframework.org domain

2007-11-04 Thread Johan Compagner
> > I meant going yourself, not paying for me! But i have no problem if somebody is paying for me!! :)

Re: Future of the wicketframework.org domain

2007-11-04 Thread Martijn Dashorst
On 11/4/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Being at an Apache Conference helps the Apache Foundation by: > - your monetary 'donation' This will bring the attendance price for Members and Committers down so you get a chance to meet more of them. I've been to last Apache Con EU ('07)

Re: Future of the wicketframework.org domain

2007-11-04 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Also, for the less fortunate I believe there are some funds available through the ASF to get help attending an Apache Conference. Though I do think you'd at least need to be a Member to apply. But the best odds to get to the conference without having to pay (much) are to prepare and give a talk, o

Re: Future of the wicketframework.org domain

2007-11-04 Thread Martijn Dashorst
I meant going yourself, not paying for me! Being at an Apache Conference helps the Apache Foundation by: - your presence - your monetary 'donation' I think going to an Apache Conference yourself and meeting with the folks behind the scenes is much more helpful for the community than keeping a d

Re: Future of the wicketframework.org domain

2007-11-04 Thread C.
On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 23:29 +0100, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > Nice to provide funds, but if we keep it, I'll donate the domain to > the ASF, which will take care of the registration fees. The ASF is now > the trademark holder, so it should be in control. However, we are in > control of the project

Re: Future of the wicketframework.org domain

2007-11-03 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Nice to provide funds, but if we keep it, I'll donate the domain to the ASF, which will take care of the registration fees. The ASF is now the trademark holder, so it should be in control. However, we are in control of the project that fills the trademark. So we can decide what to do with the domai

Re: Future of the wicketframework.org domain

2007-11-03 Thread C.
On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 19:28 +0100, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > The wicketframework.org domain is now pointing (through a redirect) to > the wicket.apache.org website. > > The domain is still registered on my name, and I'm ready to let it go. > The question is: should we keep the domain (register it

Re: Future of the wicketframework.org domain

2007-11-03 Thread Eelco Hillenius
I'd be OK with ditching it. Eelco On 11/3/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The wicketframework.org domain is now pointing (through a redirect) to > the wicket.apache.org website. > > The domain is still registered on my name, and I'm ready to let it go. > The question is: should

Future of the wicketframework.org domain

2007-11-03 Thread Martijn Dashorst
The wicketframework.org domain is now pointing (through a redirect) to the wicket.apache.org website. The domain is still registered on my name, and I'm ready to let it go. The question is: should we keep the domain (register it through the ASF) or let it expire. Expiration has the advantage that