On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 2:51 PM Maxim Solodovnik
wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 18:34, Martin Grigorov
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 8:03 AM Maxim Solodovnik
> > wrote:
> >
> > > BTW here is the discussion regarding future of commons-fileupload:
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread
On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 18:50, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 18:34, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 8:03 AM Maxim Solodovnik
> > wrote:
> >
> > > BTW here is the discussion regarding future of commons-fileupload:
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/ko
On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 18:34, Martin Grigorov wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 8:03 AM Maxim Solodovnik
> wrote:
>
> > BTW here is the discussion regarding future of commons-fileupload:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/koclgykqx0sfkrz8tf1w37n15zyql822
> > please join :)
> >
>
> Regarding com
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 8:03 AM Maxim Solodovnik
wrote:
> BTW here is the discussion regarding future of commons-fileupload:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/koclgykqx0sfkrz8tf1w37n15zyql822
> please join :)
>
Regarding commons-fileupload vs. Servlet API: I've mentioned the reason why
Wicket do
BTW here is the discussion regarding future of commons-fileupload:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/koclgykqx0sfkrz8tf1w37n15zyql822
please join :)
On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 at 21:35, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Yes but then we, wicket developers, will be responsible for tracking file
>
Hi,
Yes but then we, wicket developers, will be responsible for tracking file
upload related issues and port to wicket fixes done in the original project
(and vice versa, e.g. I already fixed one thing in wicket copy and had to
submit a PR to the original project).
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 5:23 PM
Hi Maxim-
I understand that preference— this is a build-vs-buy decision. My point is that
a file upload handler makes sense for Wicket to host itself, considering it is
a small set of functions and relates to storage management needed by Wicket
apps. Also, Wicket is more active in development a
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 at 00:40, Matt Pavlovich wrote:
>
> Why add it back? The feature is just a couple of classes. commons-fileupload2
> can continue to serve as a reference implementation to draw from.
>
> These backside dependencies create headaches when building web applications
> with Wicket
Why add it back? The feature is just a couple of classes. commons-fileupload2
can continue to serve as a reference implementation to draw from.
These backside dependencies create headaches when building web applications
with Wicket that are platforms that allow end-users to provide their own
pl
