According to my experiments, jetty doesn't start up without the
jetty-management dependency. Did you try it before removing?
Martijn
On 9/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: ehillenius
> Date: Sun Sep 9 17:30:36 2007
> New Revision: 574108
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org
Hi,
2 suggestions :
* move Start.java and jetty dependencies to the scope "test", it's not part of
the main application, it is only provide to allow developer to start an embedded
webserver from IDE for *test*
* for the same goal (running from IDE), I use winstone-lite instead of jetty (lighter
Seems to behave as expected here... Have you uncommented the JMX code
in Start.java?
On a related subject, we now have a certain amount of code
duplication, as we have a wicket-quickstart and a similar (but not
identical) set of code in wicket-archetype-quickstart. Do we have any
thoughts/guideli
[Oops - sent this direct to Martijn rather than to the list when I
replied earlier.]
Seems to behave as expected here... Have you uncommented the JMX code
in Start.java?
On a related subject, we now have a certain amount of code
duplication, as we have a wicket-quickstart and a similar (but not
i
On 9/9/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to my experiments, jetty doesn't start up without the
> jetty-management dependency. Did you try it before removing?
Of course I tried :-)
Jetty starts up fine without that dependency as long as you don't turn
on the JMX stuff (wh
