Re: [Dev] [REST APIs][Analytics] GET request with a payload

Hi Gimantha, Did you refer REST API guidelines document attached in this mail[1] in architecture mailing list. When we develop REST APIs please follow that document and if you see anything missed there please let us know. [1][Architecture] REST API Guidelines Thanks, sanjeewa. On Wed, Mar 23, 2

Re: [Dev] DAS Lucene query AllowLeadingWildcard

Yes. It can be any special character*. *But we use : to match a field to a value. Like, : On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Damith Wickramasinghe wrote: > Hi Gimantha, > > Great. One question. Does it can be any special character. ? > > Regards, > Damith. > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:49 AM,

Re: [Dev] DAS Lucene query AllowLeadingWildcard

Thanks Gimantha. On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Gimantha Bandara wrote: > Yes. It can be any special character*. *But we use : to match a field to > a value. Like, > > : > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Damith Wickramasinghe > wrote: > >> Hi Gimantha, >> >> Great. One question. Does i

Re: [Dev] gsoc project

Hi Hardik, The proposal need to me more descriptive on how you are planning to achieve and your deliverables from this project. The following is a few points you would need to consider: 1. project description - your understanding of the project 2. The proposed solution - high level architec

Re: [Dev] [Gsoc2016] [PC] Web (Javascript / D3) based BPMN editor to support a subset of commonly used BPMN constructs

Hi, I submit my final proposal through GSOC site.Could you please read my proposal and add some comments. Thank you! regards, Heshan Jayasinghe On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Isuru Wijesinghe wrote: > Hi Heshan, > > We have already added few comments. Could you please fix them and share > the

Re: [Dev] [REST APIs][Analytics] GET request with a payload

Hi Sanjeewa, Thank you for the guidelines doc. The exact problem is discussed in 10.2 in the above document. We will be filtering the record values in each records by providing the required columns, so only those column values will be returned with each record. According to the document the POST c

Re: [Dev] Running unit test form IDE error - Input file does not exist: maven-resources

Yes, I'm facing the same issue in IntelliJ IDEA 2016.1. I'm not sure that removing that line will cause any other issues. According to the Maven Bundle Plugin [1], we should be able to use {maven-resources} So, when I want to run unit tests, I just add following line to my pom's properties secti

Re: [Dev] [GSoC] Proposal 10: Security Gateway on top of WSO2 Gateway

Hi Supun, Thanks for your interest in WSO2. You can find more information regarding the project in this[1] mailing thread in WSO2 developer list. As starters clone WSO2 GW repo[2] and try the samples. I have also added project mentors in case you need more information. [1] [Dev] Proposal 10: [ESB

Re: [Dev] [Architecture] [REST APIs][Analytics] GET request with a payload

Hi Gimantha, I think the point made by Udara is valid. Anyways if the user wants to get a selected number of columns, the chances are it won't exceed the url limit. ( due to the that number being low). Thanks, Sachith On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Gimantha Bandara wrote: > Hi Sanjeewa, > >

Re: [Dev] Proposal 20: [IS] SAML Assertion Query/Request Profile support for WSO2 Identity Server

Hi Gayan, Great to hear that you are interested in doing the project! Can you please give us permissions to add comments to the proposal doc ? Regards, Omindu. On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Gayan Liyanaarachchi < gayanliyanaarach...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Omindu/Tharindu, > > > I am Gayan w

Re: [Dev] Getting "Program too complex: too big jump offset" error in a jaggery file

Hi, IMO you need to write your main logic on java and use it on jaggery file[1]. [1] http://madhukaudantha.blogspot.com/2014/02/using-java-method-from-jaggery-file.html Regards, *Dakshika Jayathilaka* PMC Member & Committer of Apache Stratos Senior Software Engineer WSO2, Inc. lean.enterprise.m

Re: [Dev] [ESB] Can we use sequence + endpoint at the same time within clone mediator ?

Identified this as invalid use case. Thread closed. Regards, Dilshani On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Dilshani Subasinghe wrote: > Hi Malaka, > > Thanks for clarification. There was an old test case for $subject and I am > checking validity of that. When I am implementing following sequences,

Re: [Dev] Running unit test form IDE error - Input file does not exist: maven-resources

Yes, this is clearly an IDE bug. I have reported it here [1]. Parent pom change is just a workaround. [1] https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-153410 On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Isuru Perera wrote: > Yes, I'm facing the same issue in IntelliJ IDEA 2016.1. > > I'm not sure that removin

Re: [Dev] Proposal 20: [IS] SAML Assertion Query/Request Profile support for WSO2 Identity Server

Hi Gayan, Your proposal looks good, I would like to suggest few more improvements. - Its better if you can list deliverables and expected challenges of the project - You have allocated time for testing in your time line which give me feeling like you are talking about manually testin

Re: [Dev] [Architecture] [REST APIs][Analytics] GET request with a payload

Hi all, POST for filterings is not an issue for special cases, as document also clearly confirms. However, I think the decision has to be made on practical use cases. This use case doesn't looks like a complex one. As Ayoma mention, it is a good idea to implement two filters to include and exclud

Re: [Dev] Getting "Program too complex: too big jump offset" error in a jaggery file

Hi, I have come across this issue before. this is because of the jaggery file size is exceeding the max size that rhino engine can compile that is 70kb (Not sure whether this is the correct size) as i know. So the solution is either modularize your code in to several files and combined them togeth

Re: [Dev] Fwd: [GSoC 16'] Proposal 20: [IS] SCIM 2.0 Support to WSO2 Identity Server

Hi Manujith, It's better to include implementation of automation tests in your proposal. The automation tests include unit & integration tests and if needed, UI tests. Also you can start blogging about your findings so far and add them in your proposal. Regards, Omindu. On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at

Re: [Dev] [Carbon] Build fail in cerbon4-kernel source code.

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Maduranga Siriwardena wrote: > Any ideas how to resolve this issue? > Hi Maduranga, I tried with both JDK 7 and 8 and the 4.4.x branch built without any issue. Can you try building with a clean maven repo? Regards, Aruna > > Thanks, > Maduranga > > On Tue, Se

[Dev] [DEV] [Architecture] [DS] Alternatives for Gadget-Dashboard communication

Hi all, WRT the discussion had in the PC, in order to persist gagdets' state we thought of providing a API for gadgets to save and retrieve their states from the dashboard URL (via hash), instead of using existing pubsub model. Therefore I did a research on alternatives to implement the API for g

Re: [Dev] GSoC '16 - Proposal 16: Contact Development Team feature in DevStudio

Hello Chanuka, please find my comments inline, I went through the DevStudio kernel and have a few questions. I'd be ever so grateful for your answers. 1. The DeveloperStudioLog class doesn't include any control scheme to limit reporting multiple cases of the same error in short time periods. Rep

Re: [Dev] Getting "Program too complex: too big jump offset" error in a jaggery file

Thanks all for the suggestions! it indeed is a limitation with js/rhino. Refactoring solves the issue. Thanks, Supun On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Nipuna Chandradasa wrote: > Hi, > > I have come across this issue before. this is because of the jaggery file > size is exceeding the max size t

[Dev] Identity Thrift Authentication Feature can't be found in Feature Management in management console

Hi all, I tried to install "*Identity Thrift Authentication Feature*"[1] on wso2carbon-4.4.3 using [2]. Although *org.wso2.carbon.identity.thrift.authentication_5.0.7.jar* is available in [2], the feature could not be found in "*Feature Management*" of management console. Any idea? [1] https://g

Re: [Dev] Proposal 20: [IS] SAML Assertion Query/Request Profile support for WSO2 Identity Server

Hi Gayan, It's better if you can allocate sometime to study the Identity Server's architecture and how the SAML implementation has been done. This is important since you'll be closely working with the SAML component throughout the project. Regards, Omindu. On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Chami

Re: [Dev] Regarding the Location and Time-based Device Policy Enforcement Project for Gsoc2016

Hi Kasun, As i was reading the documentation i understood the following approach to the problem, can you please comment if im right or wrong 1. the EMM monitors the devices for policy violations between given time intervals. 2.we can use this functionality to receive the location data of each dev

Re: [Dev] GSoC project for building an ensemble of models

Hi Anurag, Please submit your final proposal to GSoC, before the deadline. Regards, Supun On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:12 PM, Supun Sethunga wrote: > Hi Anurag, > > Looks good! May be you can also improve the diagram to reflect the > description of the three methods (which is right above the dia

Re: [Dev] [GSoC 2016] [ML] Ensemble Methods Support for WSO2 Machine Learner

Hi Hasitha, Please submit your final proposal to GSoC, before the deadline. Regards, Supun On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Hasitha Jayasundara < hasithajayasunda...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you very much > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Supun Sethunga wrote: > >> This Looks good! Please

Re: [Dev] Fwd: GSOC2016: Proposal 6: [ML]

Hi Mahesh, Please submit your final proposal to GSoC, before the deadline. Regards, Supun On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Maheshakya Wijewardena wrote: > Hi Mahesh, > > The deadline for submitting your proposals is on March 25th, 2016, > therefore please start writing the proposal and get fee

Re: [Dev] Introduction for GSoC

Hi Tanusha, Please submit your final proposal to GSoC, before the deadline. Regards, Supun On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:33 PM, CD Athuraliya wrote: > Hi Tanusha, > > Have you started writing the project proposal? If yes, can you please > share the draft with us since the proposal submission deadl

Re: [Dev] [GSoC 2016]Proposal 03:[ML] Visual (Deep) Neural Network Builder

Hi Lakini, Please complete any changes and submit your final proposal to GSoC, before the deadline (Friday). Regards, Supun On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Lakini Senanayaka < lakinisenanayak...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you for the comments. > Yes.I'll change my proposal and I'll send it soo

Re: [Dev] Applying for GSoC 2016 ----> Visual (Deep) Neural Network Builder

Hi Vishma, Please complete any changes and submit your *final proposal* to GSoC, before the deadline (Friday). Regards, Supun On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Upul Bandara wrote: > I have added few comments. > Overall, your proposal looks good to me. > > Thanks, > Upul > > On Thu, Mar 24, 201

Re: [Dev] GSoC 2016

Hi Jawadh, I hope you are aware about the deadline for proposal submission (It is 26th March 00:30 IST) .. Please try to submit it before the deadline.. Thanks, Mohan On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Mohanadarshan Vivekanandalingam < mo...@wso2.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 4:01 PM

Re: [Dev] GSoC - [CEP] Visual Query Composer for WSO2 CEP

Hi Monish, I hope you are aware about the deadline for proposal submission (It is 26th March 00:30 IST) .. Please try to submit it before the deadline.. Thanks, Mohan On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 2:37 PM, monish godhia wrote: > Sir, > Thanks for the prompt reply. I would rightaway start with

Re: [Dev] [GSoC 2016]Proposal 03:[ML] Visual (Deep) Neural Network Builder

Hi, I have modified my last proposal according to the comments and feedback I got.Could you please check my new proposal[1] for [ML] Visual (Deep) Neural Network Builder.I kindly request your feedback and comments on it. [1] Proposal 03:[ML] Visual (Deep) Neural Network Builder-V1.1

Re: [Dev] [GSoC 2016]Proposal 03:[ML] Visual (Deep) Neural Network Builder

Hi, I have modified my last proposal according to the comments and feedback I got.Could you please check my new proposal[1] for [ML] Visual (Deep) Neural Network Builder.I kindly request your feedback and comments on it. [1] Proposal 03:[ML] Visual (Deep) Neural Network Builder-V1.1

Re: [Dev] GSoc 2016-Proposal 16

Hi Awanthika and Jasintha, I have added the additional feature as optional, in my proposal as you have suggested. I submitted the draft proposal after filling up the implementation part of the document. And I also modified the architecture diagram a bit. If you can, please have a look at the

Re: [Dev] Regarding the Location and Time-based Device Policy Enforcement Project for Gsoc2016

Hi All This is a Draft proposal https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GC_NtI5bEFcIRqP7KGSjdMT0P3rYNXflw81AkHyjogs/edit please comment on the things i should improve i hope to submit it before the deadline Thank you On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Sameera Wickramasekara < itssamw...@gmail.com> w

[Dev] Fwd: GSOC Proposal 3: [ML] Visual (Deep) Neural Network Builder

-- Forwarded message -- From: Asela Damian Perera Date: Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 6:08 AM Subject: GSOC Proposal 3: [ML] Visual (Deep) Neural Network Builder To: u...@wso2.com, nir...@wso2.com Hello, I would like to engage in this project in this summer. I am currently a th

Re: [Dev] [GSoC 2016]Proposal 03:[ML] Visual (Deep) Neural Network Builder

Hi, I think some tasks of your proposed schedule can be done in parallelly. For instance, rather than wait until last minute, you can start documentation at the early stage of the project continue in parallel with other tasks. Similarly, development and testing can be done as parallel activities.

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

Hello all, I submitted my proposal to gsoc site and shared the draft with WSO2 earlier this week. Any thoughts on my proposal ? On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Dinanjana Gunaratne < dinanjanagunara...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > Can i have the location of source of carbondump tool ? > > On Wed

Re: [Dev] Regarding the Location and Time-based Device Policy Enforcement Project for Gsoc2016

Hi Sameera, Will have a look and comment by tonight. Thanks On Mar 25, 2016 1:04 AM, "Sameera Wickramasekara" wrote: > Hi All > > This is a Draft proposal > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GC_NtI5bEFcIRqP7KGSjdMT0P3rYNXflw81AkHyjogs/edit > > please comment on the things i should improve >

Re: [Dev] Native Cloud Support for Running WSO2 Middleware on Apache Mesos

Hi Osura, It looks like you have not uploaded the project proposal to GSoC website yet. Please do it immediately and do the changes afterwards. Today is the last day. Thanks On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Osura Rathnayake wrote: > okay sir 3 pm would be fine. > > thanks and regards, > Osura

Re: [Dev] Proposal 10: [ESB/GW] Security Gateway on top of WSO2 Gateway

Hi Samitha, This blog might be helpful to understand the internal structure of GW and how to write your own engines. http://shafreenanfar.blogspot.ch/2016/03/write-your-own-engine-for-wso2-gw.html On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Tishan Dahanayakage wrote: > Hi Samith, > > Thanks you for you

[Dev] WSO2 Committers += Sajith Ariyarathna

Hi All, It is my pleasure to welcome Sajith Ariyarathna as a WSO2 Committer. @ SajithAR, congratulations and keep up the good work. Regards, Dinusha. -- Dinusha Dilrukshi Associate Technical Lead WSO2 Inc.: http://wso2.com/ Mobile: +94725255071 Blog: http://dinushasblog.blogspot.com/ _

Re: [Dev] Native Cloud Support for Running WSO2 Middleware on Apache Mesos

Hi Imesh, I just shared the proposal in gsoc site. but it still needs changes and i'm working on those changes. thanks On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote: > Hi Osura, > > It looks like you have not uploaded the project proposal to GSoC website > yet. Please do it immediatel

[Dev] Setting up a local Kubernetes v1.2.0 cluster in around 2 minutes

Hi Devs, I just updated the Kubernetes Vagrant Setup [1] to do $subject. This was originally written by Pires [2], I have improved it to take the Kubernetes binary and the required Docker images from the disk to reduce the startup time and the internet usage. Docker image files are not added to t

Re: [Dev] Fwd: [GSoC 16'] Proposal 20: [IS] SCIM 2.0 Support to WSO2 Identity Server

Hi all, I added the automated unit test and integration tests under the implementation phase. Since I'm still in process of doing the PEP client simulation, I couldn't enter it in the blog, so I didn't mention in it the proposal. If I'm to find it before the deadline I will blog and insert it. Tha

[Dev] GSoC Project - Integration test framework for Dockerfiles

Hi All, My name is Abhishek and I am working on the project to design and implement an integration test framework for Dockerfiles, to ensure that changes to Dockerfiles do not cause regressions. I had very productive hangout meeting with mentors Chamila and Vishant. We are still formalizing the c

Re: [Dev] Fwd: [GSoC 16'] Proposal 20: [IS] SCIM 2.0 Support to WSO2 Identity Server

Hi Manujith, I strongly suggest you to submit your proposal to GSoC site with current progress. You can update it until the deadline. Thank You! On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Manujith Pallewatte wrote: > Hi all, > > I added the automated unit test and integration tests under the > implemen

Re: [Dev] Fwd: [GSoC 16'] Proposal 20: [IS] SCIM 2.0 Support to WSO2 Identity Server

Hi Chamila, I added the draft to GSoC site and selected the share draft option as well But didn't upload the FInal PDF still, since there's still 13 hours remaining Thanks On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Chamila Wijayarathna wrote: > Hi Manujith, > > I strongly suggest you to submit your pro