Thanks Grainier. I will check it out
Regards,
Sagar
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Grainier Perera wrote:
> Hi Sagar,
>
> From SP 4.0.0-MX [1] (formerly DASw-4.0.0-MX) <, we don't have a
> management console page (localhost:9443/carbon). Instead, we have the
> editor. Also, there are some chan
Hi Indunil,
Form token introspection response I can get below attributes.
{"scope":"openid","active":true,"token_type":"Bearer","exp":1503061170,"iat":1503057570,"client_id":"oRbEK6KkycbSLGxt3JHciaitPzoa","username":"admin@carbon.super
"}
But some of optional attributes are not included in intro
Hi Abimaran and all,
Is the requirement to expose as SPI service something introduced in Carbon
5? I am curious on how it worked with APIM 2.1.0. Can't we do the same
thing?
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Abimaran Kugathasan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are embedding Message Broker feature into API M
+Thusitha, +Jayanga
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Abimaran Kugathasan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are embedding Message Broker feature into API Manager 3.0 core, now API
> Manager will function as both MB server and client to manage its artifacts
> such as API, application, subscription, throttling
Hi,
We are embedding Message Broker feature into API Manager 3.0 core, now API
Manager will function as both MB server and client to manage its artifacts
such as API, application, subscription, throttling etc between its nodes
and Gateway. andes-client [1] will function as JMS client for embedded
Hi Isura & Indunil,
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Indunil Upeksha Rathnayake <
indu...@wso2.com> wrote:
> Hi Naduni,
>
> This was an improvement for IS 5.2.0 (Refer [1] for more information). As
> isura mentioned, you can use "updateApproveAlwaysForAppCons
> entByResourceOwner" in OAuthAdminSe
Hi Indunil,
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 7:16 PM, Indunil Upeksha Rathnayake <
indu...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Naduni Pamudika wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> In the SSO flow, first the login page appears and then the consent page where
>> the scopes are being approved b
Hi Thomas,
It is wrong to set tenantId as follows for carbon.super tenant. Super
tenant's tenantID is -1234. Can you attach full exception stacktrace.
carbonContext.setTenantId(64302);
Thanks
Isura.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Thomas LEGRAND <
thomas.legr...@versusmind.eu> wrote:
> Hello
Hi Farasath,
The logic behind returning claims in 'oidc' is based on the intersection of
both sp requested claims and the registry defined claims for the scope. So
in order to return a specific claims it should define in the registry and
it should define as a requested claims.
2. Improve the fix[
yes, we should get rid of unwanted processing.
IMO we should honour the configured requested claims in the service
provider. But I'm not aware whether there was a need to send all the claims
for open id.
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Farasath Ahamed wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> In the current impl
Hi Grainier,
Thanks for the reply. I had a discussion with Nirmal and the final solution
was to use Siddhi Map extension as you also suggesting.
However we change our approach later to push avg data directly from the
device agent, than computing them in DAS. (EDGE analytics)
Anyway thanks for the
Hi Lahiru,
You can achieve that by using JSON custom mapping [1] + Siddhi MAP
extension + IfThenElse (optional to check the availability of attributes).
Basically what you have to do is, have a;
JSON structure like this;
>
> {
>"userData": {
>"timestamp": 19900813115534,
>
> *"da
Hi Sagar,
>From SP 4.0.0-MX [1] (formerly DASw-4.0.0-MX) <, we don't have a management
console page (localhost:9443/carbon). Instead, we have the editor. Also,
there are some changes to key concepts such as receivers and publishers.
Instead of receivers and publishers, we have a new concept called
Hi all,
Thanks for the feedback. I have fixed the issues mentioned in the review
comments and also made some modifications.
Please review.
Regards,
Abilashini
*Thiyagarajah Abilashini*
Student
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka
On 11 August 2017 at
Hi
Meeting Notes .
- Discussed on how to fix the issue CROS and tried some of the suggested
once.
- Planned what should be done within the next week.
- discussed on putting an PR on Monday.
Thank you
Ravindu Perera
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Kasun Thennakoon wrote:
> more de
15 matches
Mail list logo