Hi,
We are planning to create a single set of templates for samples using Jinja
templating language. Once it is done we can remove individual sample
artifacts.
Thanks.
On Wednesday, 7 October 2015, Imesh Gunaratne wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Lasindu Charith > wrote:
>
>> Hi Akila
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Lasindu Charith wrote:
> Hi Akila/Imesh,
>
> Any reason why we moved common samples (network partitions, autoscale
> policies, deployment policies, application policies) inside each cartridge?
>
> If those artifacts are similar, what if we keep them in a common pla
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Lasindu Charith wrote:
> Hi Akila/Imesh,
>
> Any reason why we moved common samples (network partitions, autoscale
> policies, deployment policies, application policies) inside each cartridge?
>
> If those artifacts are similar, what if we keep them in a common pla
Hi Akila/Imesh,
Any reason why we moved common samples (network partitions, autoscale
policies, deployment policies, application policies) inside each cartridge?
If those artifacts are similar, what if we keep them in a common place?
(say inside common/samples/..). Once we introduce more cartridg
It looks good Akila!
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Akila Ravihansa Perera
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've restructured the repo considering what we discussed here. I've also
> added a distribution for VM related files.
>
> Final directory structure as follows;
>
> ├── common
> │ ├── configurator
> │
Hi,
I've restructured the repo considering what we discussed here. I've also
added a distribution for VM related files.
Final directory structure as follows;
├── common
│ ├── configurator
│ │ ├── live-test
│ │ │ ├── src
│ │ ├── src
│ │ │ ├── assembly
│ │ │ └── main
│
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Thanuja Uruththirakodeeswaran <
thanu...@wso2.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have folder for base-image and inside that we have a folder called
> 'docker' for docker base image. In the VM scenario, we are using
> init-scripts to create the vm base image. So what if we
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu wrote:
> Hi
>
> Shall we maintain an installer as well (specially for VM cartridges) in
> this repository to quickly create specific cartridges in puppet?
>
+1
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Akila Ravihansa Perera
wrote:
>
>
> I'm looking
Hi All,
We have folder for base-image and inside that we have a folder called
'docker' for docker base image. In the VM scenario, we are using
init-scripts to create the vm base image. So what if we move the
init-scripts folder inside /common/base-image/vm/ path?
├── common
│ ├── base-image
│
Hi Gayan
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Gayan Gunarathne wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Shall we maintain an installer as well(specially for VM cartridges) in
>> this repository to quickly create specific cartridges in puppet? What thi
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu wrote:
> Hi
>
> Shall we maintain an installer as well(specially for VM cartridges) in
> this repository to quickly create specific cartridges in puppet? What this
> installer could do is,
>
> User has to provide the packs and set of values fo
>
>
>
> Shall we maintain an installer as well(specially for VM cartridges) in
> this repository to quickly create specific cartridges in puppet? What this
> installer could do is,
>
> User has to provide the packs and set of values for the environment
> variables.
>
> - Install puppet master
> - L
Hi
Shall we maintain an installer as well(specially for VM cartridges) in this
repository to quickly create specific cartridges in puppet? What this
installer could do is,
User has to provide the packs and set of values for the environment
variables.
- Install puppet master
- Locate the relevant
Hi Akila,
Common folder has all the common stuff related to the cartridges.So if
someone can navigate to the common folder and get the stuff shared among
the cartridges.
I think it is meaningful to have those common stuff at a one place, then
someone new to this repository also have a feeling tho
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Akila Ravihansa Perera
wrote:
>
> Wouldn't it be easier to navigate if we move those common folders to root
> folder?
>
> The problem is that then the cartridges would mix up with the common ones.
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Akila Ravihansa Perera
wrote:
Hi Gayan,
Wouldn't it be easier to navigate if we move those common folders to root
folder?
We can create a common folder under /plugins/ folder to keep common PCA
plugins and util files.
Just a thought...wdyt?
Thanks.
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Gayan Gunarathne wrote:
> Adding to the
Adding to the Dev list
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote:
> Shall we move this discussion to Dev?
>
> Thanks
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:02 PM, Gayan Gunarathne
> wrote:
>
>> As puppet,init-scripts,base image are common for all the cartridges,shall
>> we group them under
17 matches
Mail list logo