[Dev] Setting JMS Version gloably

2016-06-07 Thread Manuranga Perera
Hi Ravindra/Dilshani, Can we set transport.jms.JMSSpecVersion globally (ie: via axis2.xml)? -- With regards, *Manu*ranga Perera. phone : 071 7 70 20 50 mail : m...@wso2.com ___ Dev mailing list Dev@wso2.org http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

Re: [Dev] Setting JMS Version gloably

2016-06-07 Thread Dilshani Subasinghe
Hi Manuranga, According to documentation, Yes we can set that. But I notice that, it doesn't validate through the value given globally. For example, even I set up JMS Version as 2.0 globally, it doesn't take that value. Within the source (ServiceTaskManager.java) it seem to hard coded. */** Sho

Re: [Dev] Setting JMS Version gloably

2016-06-07 Thread Vijitha Ekanayake
Hi Manu/Dilshani, According to the current implementation It seems, we haven't done any changes in JMSTransportListener side. JMS 2.0 listener implementation is supported as JMS inbound endpoint and sender implementation support on JMS transport sender. You can refer mail thread[1] for more detail

Re: [Dev] Setting JMS Version gloably

2016-06-07 Thread Ravindra Ranwala
Hi Manu, Vijitha's comment is valid. As per the offline discussion I had with ErandaR and PrabathAR, JMS 2.0 shared subscription feature is not implemented for JMS Proxy services (in axis2 transport listener side) since it will be deprecated in future. Therefore it is available for JMS Inbound End

Re: [Dev] Setting JMS Version gloably

2016-06-08 Thread Manuranga Perera
Hi Eranda, In the doc, it shows how to setup JMS 2 listener proxy via inline parmas [1] [2]. Which one is correct, the doc or above claim? Hi ESB Team, Please re-consider supporting JMS 2 via axis2 xml as well, since setting up a large number of inbounds are hard to manage. Eg: If I need to change

Re: [Dev] Setting JMS Version gloably

2016-06-08 Thread Eranda Rajapakshe
Hi Manuranga, JMS 2.0 listeners inside ESB should be configured as Inbound Endpoints. You can refer [1] sample for the correct configuration. And I have updated the document [2] as well so that there won't be any confusions. [1]. https://docs.google.com/document/d/17Q6B60KYrU53YfxPyML_YKZftCrNWH