Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1304
I think this can be closed
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1304
this have been stale for quite a while, so I'll start looking into it
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1304
@corneadoug I've just tried the scenario you have, and it was running
correctly (without np) when you switch to different revisions. the only thing
is that it was running the `head` version
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1304
@corneadoug thanks for letting me know, i'll look into that and get back to
you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1304
@khalidhuseynov
I found out that websocket events at Notebook level are already blocked in
the revision (I don't receive anything, and my actions are not affecting the
original note).
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1304
any ETA on this one, so that can plan accordingly?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1304
@corneadoug please let us know if there still are any troubles, after #1254
got merged!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1304
@bzz exactly, that's the point i was trying to make in #1254.
@anthonycorbacho i'm completely agree with you, and that was the original
starting premise.
I'm happy that everyone go
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1304
@corneadoug thank you for explaining!
So we are talking about WS API to fetch full notebook state from the
history by it's revision? Wich on client-side looks like
[websocketMsgSrv.getNoteRev
Github user anthonycorbacho commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1304
@khalidhuseynov are we really sure about sending `complex object` as a
parameter in the URL?
How will it be represented? encoded?
IMO it is not a good idea, if you ask for a re
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1304
@bzz
The front-end needs to be able to get the Notebook's revision and show it.
To do that, there is a websocket event that originally looked like that:
`websocketMsgSrv.getNoteRevisi
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1304
To avoid the confusion, could you guys quickly bring me up to speed with,
what `API needs to be fixed to send Revision ID` means in this context?
As far as I understood, we are talking in this
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1304
@corneadoug thanks for clarification. in this case, how do you think it
would look like if `revisionId` cannot be represented as simple string and it's
more like complex object?
I
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1304
@khalidhuseynov that doesn't solve anything, I can't work with Revision, it
needs to be RevisionId.
If you visit a URL like: /notebook/:noteId/revision/:revisionId
All you have is t
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1304
@corneadoug thanks for taking care of this! #1308 is merged and instead of
`RevisionId` just send `Revision`. rebase should solve the problems.
---
If your project is set up for it, you ca
15 matches
Mail list logo
