See in-lined...
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 04:25AM, moon soo Lee wrote:
> >
> > I don't see how it is possible. Empirically it isn't ever a case as well.
> > Could you please elaborate how this might happen in your view?
> >
> >
> Let me share some history about Zeppelin project,
> It was developed i
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/478#issuecomment-160251176
Tested and LGTM.
Merge if there're no more discussions
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/480#issuecomment-160251125
I think providing a button to restart interpreter in the notebook page is
good idea.
But 'Restart Interpreter' button seem to displayed when parag
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/475
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/477#issuecomment-160250467
LGTM
Merge if there're no more discussions
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/483#issuecomment-160250426
Merge if there is no more discussions
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/481#issuecomment-160250281
Tested and LGTM.
Merge if there're no more discussions
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/482#issuecomment-160249457
Thanks @r-kamath for review.
Merge if there're no more discussions
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
rep
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/486#issuecomment-160248292
Looks good to me
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/486
[ZEPPELIN-428] [DOCS] [followup] fix formatting for code blocks
Fix code block formatting
http://zeppelin.incubator.apache.org/docs/0.5.5-incubating/manual/dynamicform.html
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 10:47 AM Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 01:15AM, moon soo Lee wrote:
> > Thanks for starting the thread. I was keep an eye on discussion about
> > CTR/RTC on the general@incubator.
> >
> > I saw people think RTC means lack of trust in that discussion.
> I have a PR that has been pending since *August*. It’s the subject of 2
> jira’s, and I’d emailed members of the PMC about it several times. It has
Have you emails the dev@ list?
Repeatedly.
Actually, it isn't a requirement. Perhaps some one told you this mistakenly,
but it is not. Here's
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 09:02PM, Amos B. Elberg wrote:
> I think CTR may be a good idea.
>
> Considering all the excellent efforts to build community by Moon and others,
> I can understand why he has experienced the community in the way he
> describes.
>
> My experience, however, has been diffe
I think CTR may be a good idea.
Considering all the excellent efforts to build community by Moon and others, I
can understand why he has experienced the community in the way he describes.
My experience, however, has been different. I’m not sure that community
involvement is either as broad,
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/485#issuecomment-160238011
looks good
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 01:15AM, moon soo Lee wrote:
> Thanks for starting the thread. I was keep an eye on discussion about
> CTR/RTC on the general@incubator.
>
> I saw people think RTC means lack of trust in that discussion. To me that
> is complete nonsense. I can say, RTC trust others more, t
Thanks for starting the thread. I was keep an eye on discussion about
CTR/RTC on the general@incubator.
I saw people think RTC means lack of trust in that discussion. To me that
is complete nonsense. I can say, RTC trust others more, trust reviewer. So
I don't agree the "reason" CTR over RTC in th
Guys,
as you might have seen on the general@incubator list, there's a lengthy
discussion about benefits of Commit-Then-Review (CTR) development model over
Review-Then-Commit (RTC) one.
As the project is getting more mature, I would like to start the conversation
on what the community think about
Good points! There's another benefit to it: with a common set of coding styles
it'd easier to onboard new contributors. And it is easier for reviewers by
sticking to the same ground rules.
Cos
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 10:48AM, Felix Cheung wrote:
> +1, +1 also on discussing Coding guideline / Codi
+1, +1 also on discussing Coding guideline / Coding style on
http://flink.apache.org/contribute-code.html - think we should adopt it as
applicable to this community.
> From: m...@apache.org
> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 08:23:53 +
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]Strict code style and PR guide
> To: dev@
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/477#issuecomment-160185762
@corneadoug Oh I didn't noticed that. I canceled the last commit !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply a
Github user jiekechoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/361#issuecomment-160135681
@jongyoul I mean how to use jdbc interpreter.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as wel
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/485#issuecomment-160131146
Ready to merge
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/483#issuecomment-160129427
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
GitHub user Leemoonsoo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/485
ZEPPELIN-469 Interpreter process loads unnecessary classes
Addresses issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-469
This PR fixes problem by remove `export ZEPPELIN_
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/468#issuecomment-160115088
Thanks for the fix, LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
GitHub user prabhjyotsingh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/484
Distribution Management
To manage distribution of the artifact and supporting files generated
throughout the build process
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository b
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/475#issuecomment-160104186
Merge if there is no more discussions
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/471#issuecomment-160103988
Merge if there're no more discussions
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/467
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Kevin Tsai created ZEPPELIN-471:
---
Summary: Could not find creator property with name ... with
embedded spark binaries
Key: ZEPPELIN-471
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-471
Project: Z
Kevin Tsai created ZEPPELIN-470:
---
Summary: NoSuchMethodError: scala.Predef ... with defining
SPARK_HOME
Key: ZEPPELIN-470
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-470
Project: Zeppelin
Github user corneadoug commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/477#issuecomment-160086482
I fixed the navbar in #462
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user r-kamath commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/482#issuecomment-160082731
:+1: LGTM. works well on Chrome and Firefox
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user r-kamath commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/483#issuecomment-160080960
tested. LGTM :+1:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Lee moon soo created ZEPPELIN-469:
-
Summary: Interpreter process loads unnecessary classes
Key: ZEPPELIN-469
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-469
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Ty
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/477#issuecomment-160069073
Originally I want to make some space between img in the documentation.
However, as a result, I made a useless space in the mobile like below
attached
So far, we have two related docs.
http://zeppelin.incubator.apache.org/docs/latest/development/howtocontribute.html
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md
Having a code-contribution guide, such as Flink's one is going to help not
only code quality but also gettin
Hi devs,
I think It's time to make codes clean and clear. In the former stage of
Zeppelin, It's important to add functions to enrich codes but, as time
goes, with several codes style, it's hard to maintain code quality. I
suggest it's good to follow Flink's way(
http://flink.apache.org/contribute-
39 matches
Mail list logo
