Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/789#issuecomment-201166366
The reason set env in RemoteInterpreter is, environment variable need to
set before the process creation. So shell script (./bin/interpreter.sh) can
take
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/795#issuecomment-201159154
@echarles Thanks for the feedbacks.
Regarding ZEPPELIN-761, it is a problem of way SparkInterpreter implements
'instance' mode rather than a probl
Github user echarles commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/789#issuecomment-201156913
Current patch sets env in RemoteInterpreter and system properties in
RemoteInterpreterServer. Why is this unbalanced (I would have expected setting
env and
Hello. Thank you for reading it. I hope it's not too late. Here's the link:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lFAsHFuJhnmlG4rhaVqm0MxiJgr4MoRq-IpqTJuKb1Y/edit#heading=h.ldfyp8290lrw
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Alexander Bezzubov wrote:
> Hi Shivani,
>
> thank you for reaching out Zeppel
Github user echarles commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/795#issuecomment-201153577
Also, should non `shared` modes be marked as `experimental` (see
ZEPPELIN-761). There could be unexpected side effects while using the Spark
REPL in non sta
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/788#issuecomment-201150165
I'm merging if there're no more discussions
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/791#issuecomment-201148089
@bzz Yes, that seems flaky test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user felizbear commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/796#issuecomment-201147629
You can map over these objects either using
[lodash](https://lodash.com/docs#map), or doing something like
`Object.keys(obj).map(key => obj[key]).sort(...)
Github user bzz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/791#issuecomment-201146477
Somehow CI is failing =\
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Hi Shivani,
thank you for reaching out Zeppelin project developer's mailing list, hope
your explorations on Helium were fruitful.
If you could post the link to the proposal draft in this thread, I will be
happy to add it to project wiki [1]
1.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZEPPELI
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/791#issuecomment-201144982
Merge if there're no more discussions
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
Hi Onkar,
that sounds great, thank you.
Looking forward helping with this project though the summer!
--
Alex
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 2:27 PM, onkar shedge
wrote:
> Thanks Sir,
> I have made the changes: diagram, Deliverables removed research. And
> support for one more p2p storage.
> Also I
Hi Jiayi,
glad to hear that you are interested. You can submit the proposal draft
until the deadline [1]
1. https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/timeline
--
Alex
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Jiayi Ye wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am Jiayi Ye from Peking University, China. I researched on
Github user echarles commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/795#issuecomment-201143067
I don't in the src any change on the SparkInterpeter to deal with this new
conf.
About default, sharing variables between notes is sometimes not the
Thanks Sir,
I have made the changes: diagram, Deliverables removed research. And
support for one more p2p storage.
Also I have uploaded the pdf.
Regards,
Onkar Shedge
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Alexander Bezzubov wrote:
> Hi Onkar,
>
> thank you for sharing a blog and even a video of you
Hi,
glad to hear you are interested.
If you could introduce yourself here, I'll be happy to add you to the
project wiki [1]
1.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZEPPELIN/Google+Summer+Of+Code+2016
--
Alex
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Sbf xyz wrote:
> Hello. I have submitted the
Hi Minudika,
thank you for sharing, that sounds great.
Looking forward helping with this project though GSoC!
--
Alex
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 3:11 AM, Minudika Malshan
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I submitted my final proposal to google. Thanks a lot for your guidance
> and support.
> Hopefully looki
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/795#issuecomment-201140823
@EronWright Thanks for the opinion. I prefer leave 'shared' as a default
value for now, and make default value configurable in a separate issue. would
it
Hi Paul,
sounds great, please do not forget to submit the final pdf to google.
Looking forward helping with this project!
--
Alex
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Paul Bustios Belizario
wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> 7-8 notebooks sounds reasonable to me. I will adjust the schedule and
> include
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/794#issuecomment-201134262
@rawkintrevo Thanks for the contribution.
[One of test profile of last CI
run](https://travis-ci.org/apache/incubator-zeppelin/jobs/118366944) fails wi
Github user johnnyws commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/796#issuecomment-201132560
@felizbear Thanks for your comments. Please correct me if I am wrong,
because I have very limited knowledge in javascript. It seems we can create
objects dy
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/792#issuecomment-201131454
Thanks for useful feature.
LGTM and merge if there're no more discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
GitHub user johnnyws opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/797
remove overwritten style for p
### What is this PR for?
I don't know why we overwrite `p` in paragraph.css, but the layout is much
nicer for markdown paragraphs
### Wh
Github user felizbear commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/796#issuecomment-201130260
@johnnyws what is your opinion on [this
comment](https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/767#discussion_r55478812)?
---
If your project is set u
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/783#issuecomment-201126753
Merge this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user jeffsteinmetz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/702#issuecomment-201124666
@Leemoonsoo
https://github.com/datalayer/zeppelin-datalayer/pull/7 does appear to have
cleaned up the interpreter attribute duplication of spark.ma
Github user zhongneu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/767
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the f
Github user johnnyws commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/796#issuecomment-201122281
I am bring this back to live again. I made a couple of changes based on the
comments of the previous pull request. Now it is ready to review/merge
---
If y
GitHub user johnnyws opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/796
[ZEPPELIN-209] Folder support for notebooks (based on pr-190 & pr-767)
### What is this PR for?
Add folder support. When create a new notebook, use '/' to separate folders.
Github user EronWright commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/795#issuecomment-201110094
The 'process' option should be the default option for Spark in my opinion,
since it solves so many issues.A note with dependencies cannot be reliably
Github user rawkintrevo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/794#issuecomment-201109499
once again failing on npm install.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If you
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/703#issuecomment-201087563
@EronWright @sourav-mazumder. I just created a pullrequest
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/795, Please take a look.
---
If your project
GitHub user Leemoonsoo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/795
[ZEPPELIN-183] Interpreter process per note
### What is this PR for?
This PR give an option to create interpreter process per notebook.
### What type of PR is it?
Johnny W. created ZEPPELIN-761:
--
Summary: Class loading issue when enabling separated interpreters
Key: ZEPPELIN-761
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-761
Project: Zeppelin
Iss
Trevor Grant created ZEPPELIN-760:
-
Summary: Scala: not accepting companion objects if defined in
different lines
Key: ZEPPELIN-760
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-760
Project: Zep
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/703#issuecomment-201039365
It's still an open issue. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-183
While trying to answer the question 'how hard would it be', i realized
Hi all,
I submitted my final proposal to google. Thanks a lot for your guidance and
support.
Hopefully looking forward to work on this project.
Thanks again.
Best regards
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Minudika Malshan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> @Alex, Sorry for my mistake. Added back to the mail thr
Github user EronWright commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/703#issuecomment-200943860
@sourav-mazumder @Leemoonsoo There are two good reasons why Zeppelin should
run each note as a separate Spark app instance.
1. Dependencies - each note
Hello,
As suggested the mvn install command worked and the Sparkmon project was
built successfully. Then I imported the project in Eclipse as an existing
Maven project but strangely eclipse was not able to recognize the following
imports(unable to find the libraries):
import org.apache.zeppelin.h
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/702#issuecomment-200917099
@echarles Thanks for taking a look!
> Good idea to reuse the rscala from the spark dist.
Little bit more precisely,
https://github.com/d
Github user seufagner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/162#issuecomment-200913876
It works now! Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user echarles commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/702#issuecomment-200906016
@Leemoonsoo I have a list of comments and actions (mainly coming from
@jeffsteinmetz) I had planned to work out this weekend. You PR comes to the
point. I s
Hi Alexander,
7-8 notebooks sounds reasonable to me. I will adjust the schedule and
include that in my proposal.
About adding my work on Electroencephalograms, I can do that, I just
thought that big data sets would be more attractive, but there is no
problem, the data sets I'm using are public as
Github user doanduyhai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/162#issuecomment-200882148
@seufagner This is because the zeppelin-0.5.6-incubating-bin-all.tgz build
is using an old version of Guava. Just put Guava version >= 16.0.1 jars (for
ex
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/734
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/793#issuecomment-200874185
Merge if there're no more discussions
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/787
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/791#issuecomment-200869487
@mwkang No worries. Thanks for taking care of the license.
I have checked aws-java-sdk-s3:1.10.62 brings no new/changes of transitive
dependency.
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/702#issuecomment-200852943
@echarles Hi I have made [Pullrequest to this
branch](https://github.com/datalayer/zeppelin-datalayer/pull/7), please take a
look and comment. Which remov
Hello Mentors,
Sorry for late response. I was surveying on Helium, and datasets to
use. I have shared draft of my proposal. Please let me know the changes to
make.
ThankYou
Hi,
I am Jiayi Ye from Peking University, China. I researched on P2P softwares such
as Bittorrent, BTSync, Twister and so on. And I am familiar with DHT. I want to
contribute to the project (Zeppelin-683). In addition, I have checked out
Zeppelin and had a rough look at its notebook storage suc
Hello. I have submitted the draft of my proposal . Mentors please have a
look when possible and let me know so i can make appropriate corrections
and submit final pdf.
I submitted a little bit late because i was surveying various available
datasets and trying out more in zeppelin and spark.
Thanks.
Hi Onkar,
thank you for sharing a blog and even a video of your explorations in
preparation for the project.
Your timeline and proposal looks very strong and it seems that you relevant
experience for this project.
On the GSoC scope - it would be a good start with a storage
implementation(s) that
Hi,
@Alex, Sorry for my mistake. Added back to the mail thread.
I will go through the whole proposal once again, finalize it and submit the
final proposal to google gsoc page by tonight.
Thanks a lot for your help.
BR
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Minudika Malshan
wrote:
> [looping]
>
>
>
[looping]
Hi Alex,
I will go through that spark runner and see if it's possible to use it for
this beam interpreter. And hopefully, I will include it in the proposal.
I was communicating through Apache beam mailing thread to get more
knowledge about that project. But it seems like I have misse
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/786
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
56 matches
Mail list logo
