[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13050966#comment-13050966
]
Hudson commented on ZOOKEEPER-335:
--
Integrated in ZooKeeper-trunk #1215 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13050968#comment-13050968
]
Hudson commented on ZOOKEEPER-1081:
---
Integrated in ZooKeeper-trunk #1215 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13050969#comment-13050969
]
Hudson commented on ZOOKEEPER-1082:
---
Integrated in ZooKeeper-trunk #1215 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051160#comment-13051160
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-723:
-
i'm afraid the semantics have gotten
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nate Putnam updated ZOOKEEPER-1087:
---
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1087.patch
ForceSync VM arguement not working when set to no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051190#comment-13051190
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-1087:
--
-1 overall. Here are the results of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Patrick Hunt reassigned ZOOKEEPER-1087:
---
Assignee: Nate Putnam
ForceSync VM arguement not working when set to no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Patrick Hunt updated ZOOKEEPER-1087:
Fix Version/s: 3.3.4
ForceSync VM arguement not working when set to no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051265#comment-13051265
]
Daniel Gómez Ferro commented on ZOOKEEPER-723:
--
Maybe it is a good idea to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051281#comment-13051281
]
Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-723:
bq. How is this different from having
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051291#comment-13051291
]
Nate Putnam commented on ZOOKEEPER-1087:
Totally. New patch attached.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nate Putnam updated ZOOKEEPER-1087:
---
Attachment: (was: ZOOKEEPER-1087.patch)
ForceSync VM arguement not working when set
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nate Putnam updated ZOOKEEPER-1087:
---
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1087.patch
ForceSync VM arguement not working when set to no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051296#comment-13051296
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-1087:
--
-1 overall. Here are the results of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nate Putnam updated ZOOKEEPER-1087:
---
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1087.patch
ForceSync VM arguement not working when set to no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051307#comment-13051307
]
Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-1087:
-
fyi no need to delete the old
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051314#comment-13051314
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-1087:
--
+1 overall. Here are the results of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051334#comment-13051334
]
Nate Putnam commented on ZOOKEEPER-1087:
I'm not sure what is going on with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nate Putnam updated ZOOKEEPER-1087:
---
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1087.patch
ForceSync VM arguement not working when set to no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051342#comment-13051342
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-1087:
--
-1 overall. Here are the results of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051387#comment-13051387
]
Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-1087:
-
you want something like:
import
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051407#comment-13051407
]
Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-770:
Hm, I'm held up because I see this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051410#comment-13051410
]
Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-770:
I updated the code to output the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051422#comment-13051422
]
Craig Calef commented on ZOOKEEPER-770:
---
When I was writing the test I had the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051438#comment-13051438
]
Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-1097:
-
The actual latest patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-26?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051074#comment-13051074
]
Ivan Kelly commented on BOOKKEEPER-26:
--
Which do we prefer, 2 or 4? 2 is the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-26?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051080#comment-13051080
]
Flavio Junqueira commented on BOOKKEEPER-26:
I prefer 4, but I'm not sure
27 matches
Mail list logo