[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-335) zookeeper servers should commit the new leader txn to their logs.

2011-06-17 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13050966#comment-13050966 ] Hudson commented on ZOOKEEPER-335: -- Integrated in ZooKeeper-trunk #1215 (See

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1081) modify leader/follower code to correctly deal with new leader

2011-06-17 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13050968#comment-13050968 ] Hudson commented on ZOOKEEPER-1081: --- Integrated in ZooKeeper-trunk #1215 (See

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1082) modify leader election to correctly take into account current epoch

2011-06-17 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13050969#comment-13050969 ] Hudson commented on ZOOKEEPER-1082: --- Integrated in ZooKeeper-trunk #1215 (See

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-723) ephemeral parent znodes

2011-06-17 Thread Benjamin Reed (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051160#comment-13051160 ] Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-723: - i'm afraid the semantics have gotten

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1087) ForceSync VM arguement not working when set to no

2011-06-17 Thread Nate Putnam (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nate Putnam updated ZOOKEEPER-1087: --- Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1087.patch ForceSync VM arguement not working when set to no

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1087) ForceSync VM arguement not working when set to no

2011-06-17 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051190#comment-13051190 ] Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-1087: -- -1 overall. Here are the results of

[jira] [Assigned] (ZOOKEEPER-1087) ForceSync VM arguement not working when set to no

2011-06-17 Thread Patrick Hunt (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Patrick Hunt reassigned ZOOKEEPER-1087: --- Assignee: Nate Putnam ForceSync VM arguement not working when set to no

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1087) ForceSync VM arguement not working when set to no

2011-06-17 Thread Patrick Hunt (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Patrick Hunt updated ZOOKEEPER-1087: Fix Version/s: 3.3.4 ForceSync VM arguement not working when set to no

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-723) ephemeral parent znodes

2011-06-17 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051265#comment-13051265 ] Daniel Gómez Ferro commented on ZOOKEEPER-723: -- Maybe it is a good idea to

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-723) ephemeral parent znodes

2011-06-17 Thread Patrick Hunt (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051281#comment-13051281 ] Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-723: bq. How is this different from having

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1087) ForceSync VM arguement not working when set to no

2011-06-17 Thread Nate Putnam (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051291#comment-13051291 ] Nate Putnam commented on ZOOKEEPER-1087: Totally. New patch attached.

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1087) ForceSync VM arguement not working when set to no

2011-06-17 Thread Nate Putnam (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nate Putnam updated ZOOKEEPER-1087: --- Attachment: (was: ZOOKEEPER-1087.patch) ForceSync VM arguement not working when set

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1087) ForceSync VM arguement not working when set to no

2011-06-17 Thread Nate Putnam (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nate Putnam updated ZOOKEEPER-1087: --- Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1087.patch ForceSync VM arguement not working when set to no

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1087) ForceSync VM arguement not working when set to no

2011-06-17 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051296#comment-13051296 ] Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-1087: -- -1 overall. Here are the results of

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1087) ForceSync VM arguement not working when set to no

2011-06-17 Thread Nate Putnam (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nate Putnam updated ZOOKEEPER-1087: --- Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1087.patch ForceSync VM arguement not working when set to no

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1087) ForceSync VM arguement not working when set to no

2011-06-17 Thread Patrick Hunt (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051307#comment-13051307 ] Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-1087: - fyi no need to delete the old

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1087) ForceSync VM arguement not working when set to no

2011-06-17 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051314#comment-13051314 ] Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-1087: -- +1 overall. Here are the results of

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1087) ForceSync VM arguement not working when set to no

2011-06-17 Thread Nate Putnam (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051334#comment-13051334 ] Nate Putnam commented on ZOOKEEPER-1087: I'm not sure what is going on with

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1087) ForceSync VM arguement not working when set to no

2011-06-17 Thread Nate Putnam (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nate Putnam updated ZOOKEEPER-1087: --- Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1087.patch ForceSync VM arguement not working when set to no

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1087) ForceSync VM arguement not working when set to no

2011-06-17 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051342#comment-13051342 ] Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-1087: -- -1 overall. Here are the results of

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1087) ForceSync VM arguement not working when set to no

2011-06-17 Thread Patrick Hunt (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051387#comment-13051387 ] Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-1087: - you want something like: import

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-770) Slow add_auth calls with multi-threaded client

2011-06-17 Thread Patrick Hunt (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051407#comment-13051407 ] Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-770: Hm, I'm held up because I see this

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-770) Slow add_auth calls with multi-threaded client

2011-06-17 Thread Patrick Hunt (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051410#comment-13051410 ] Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-770: I updated the code to output the

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-770) Slow add_auth calls with multi-threaded client

2011-06-17 Thread Craig Calef (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051422#comment-13051422 ] Craig Calef commented on ZOOKEEPER-770: --- When I was writing the test I had the

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1097) Quota is not correctly rehydrated on snapshot reload

2011-06-17 Thread Camille Fournier (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051438#comment-13051438 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-1097: - The actual latest patch

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-26) Indentation is all messed up in the BookKeeper code

2011-06-17 Thread Ivan Kelly (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-26?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051074#comment-13051074 ] Ivan Kelly commented on BOOKKEEPER-26: -- Which do we prefer, 2 or 4? 2 is the

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-26) Indentation is all messed up in the BookKeeper code

2011-06-17 Thread Flavio Junqueira (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-26?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051080#comment-13051080 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on BOOKKEEPER-26: I prefer 4, but I'm not sure