ZooKeeper_branch35_openjdk7 - Build # 473 - Still Failing

See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper_branch35_openjdk7/473/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### [...truncated 61.39 MB...] [junit] at org.jboss.netty

Re: ZOOKEEPER-900

Hi Atri, Comment on the issues themselves. It helps. Regards, Eddie On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 1:33 AM, Atri Sharma wrote: > Hi Patrick, > > I am fine with either. I tried pinging the owners but got no response. > > Please let me know. > > Regards, > > Atri > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 4:51 AM, Pa

Vote on release 3.4.10 candidate 1

Thank you to the whole community on the effort to get a release candidate out. Everyone, please take this opportunity to test and vote on the release candidate by March 29th 2017, 23:59 UTC+0. It would be really helpful if multiple folks test with their systems to make sure that the RC is good. T

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-2722) Flaky Test: org.apache.zookeeper.test.ReadOnlyModeTest.testSessionEstablishment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Han updated ZOOKEEPER-2722: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 3.5.3) 3.5.4 > Flaky Test: > org.apache.zooke

[GitHub] zookeeper issue #210: Fix typo

Github user afine commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/210 +1 looks like this typo also exists in branch-3.4 and branch-3.5 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does

[GitHub] zookeeper issue #210: Fix typo

Github user afine commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/210 @jeffwidman could you please open a jira to track this change: https://issues.apache.org/jira/ --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.10 candidate 1

+1 (non-binding). * Download source, verified checksum and signatures. * Build source successfully on OS X and Ubuntu. Unit tests pass (both Java and C). * Deploy a 3 node ensemble. Verified sanity through command line and smoke test. * Deploy a 3 node ensemble with Kerberos enabled (ZOOKEEPER-104

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-2741) A Swift Connector of ZooKeeper is available now: Perfect-ZooKeeper

Rockford Wei created ZOOKEEPER-2741: --- Summary: A Swift Connector of ZooKeeper is available now: Perfect-ZooKeeper Key: ZOOKEEPER-2741 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2741 Projec

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-2741) A Swift Connector of ZooKeeper is available now: Perfect-ZooKeeper

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rockford Wei updated ZOOKEEPER-2741: Description: Perfect-ZooKeeper is a Swift class wrapper of zookeeper C connector: Sourc

ZooKeeper-trunk-openjdk7 - Build # 1418 - Failure

See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-openjdk7/1418/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### [...truncated 62.91 MB...] [junit] at org.jboss.netty.c

Failed: ZOOKEEPER- PreCommit Build #490

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-build/490/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### [...truncated 19.33 KB...] warning: Cannot merge bi

ZooKeeper_branch35_jdk8 - Build # 475 - Failure

See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper_branch35_jdk8/475/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### [...truncated 66.26 MB...] [junit] 2017-03-28 20:59:56,884 [my

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.10 candidate 1

fwiw I also tried running a 3 and 23 node cluster and it worked fine. 3.4.9 client accessing 3.4.10 rc1 ensemble worked fine as well. Patrick On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > +1 - xsum/sig verified, RAT ran clean, was able to build and run the tests > successfully (mac). >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.10 candidate 1

Yes, I forgot to mention that I did some backward compatible verification as well. I was using 3.4.10 client to connect to a 3.5.3 ensemble and it works as expected. On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > fwiw I also tried running a 3 and 23 node cluster and it worked fine. 3.4.9

ZooKeeper_branch35_jdk7 - Build # 907 - Failure

See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper_branch35_jdk7/907/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### [...truncated 64.51 MB...] [junit] 2017-03-28 21:54:41,588 [my

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.10 candidate 1

+1, ran tests, checked signature and digests, checked license and notice, ran some smoke tests locally. -Flavio > On 28 Mar 2017, at 22:44, Michael Han wrote: > > Yes, I forgot to mention that I did some backward compatible verification > as well. I was using 3.4.10 client to connect to a 3.5.

[VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.3-beta candidate 0

Hi all, With heartfelt thanks to many contributors, the RC0 for 3.5.3-beta is ready. 3.5.3-beta is the first beta in the planned 3.5 release line leading up to a stable 3.5 release. It comprises 76 fixes, improvements, and new features since 3.5.2-alpha was released on July 20th, 2016. This rele

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-900) FLE implementation should be improved to use non-blocking sockets

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15946569#comment-15946569 ] Atri Sharma commented on ZOOKEEPER-900: --- Ping? > FLE implementation should be im