Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

2019-10-15 Thread Flavio Junqueira
Executed 4 letter word commands >> Verified admin server commands >> Ran rat >> All are OK :-) >> >> >> Thanks & Regards >> Mohammad Arshad >> >> -Original Message----- >> From: sujith simon [mailto:sujithsimo...@gmail.com] >>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

2019-10-14 Thread Patrick Hunt
Verified admin server commands > > > Ran rat > > > All are OK :-) > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards > > > Mohammad Arshad > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: sujith simon [mailto:sujithsimo...@gmail.com] >

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

2019-10-14 Thread Justin Ling Mao
configuration without any tuning. Benchmark result:PS: workloada(read:50%,write:50%); workloadb(read:95%,write:5%); workloadc(read:100%) - Original Message - From: Zili Chen To: DevZooKeeper Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4 Date: 2019-10-14 06:55 +1 (non-binding

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

2019-10-13 Thread Enrico Olivelli
) > > > > > > Thanks & Regards > > Mohammad Arshad > > > > -Original Message- > > From: sujith simon [mailto:sujithsimo...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2019 11:32 AM > > To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org > > Subject: R

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

2019-10-11 Thread Zili Chen
mands > Ran rat > All are OK :-) > > > Thanks & Regards > Mohammad Arshad > > -Original Message- > From: sujith simon [mailto:sujithsimo...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2019 11:32 AM > To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] A

RE: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

2019-10-11 Thread Mohammad arshad
shad -Original Message- From: sujith simon [mailto:sujithsimo...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2019 11:32 AM To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4 +1 (non-binding) - Verified Checksum - Verified Signature - Verfied that tags are cor

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

2019-10-11 Thread sujith simon
+1 (non-binding) - Verified Checksum - Verified Signature - Verfied that tags are correct - Verified build, installed ZooKeeper and tested basic commands from source tarball - Installed ZooKeeper from bin tarball on a 3 node cluster and tested basic ZooKeeper commands - Verified that Unit tests

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

2019-10-10 Thread Norbert Kalmar
+1 (non-binding) - unit tests pass - built and started ZK + run few commands from source tarball - checked bin tarball, license files, run ZK + few commands - signature OK. - git tag OK :) Thanks Enrico! Norbert On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 10:45 PM Andor Molnar wrote: > +1 > > Verified… > > -

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

2019-10-09 Thread Andor Molnar
+1 Verified… - checksums, signature, - unit tests - 3-node cluster smoke tests. Andor > On 2019. Oct 9., at 22:40, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Il mer 9 ott 2019, 21:14 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > >> +1 checksums/sig validated. rat ran clean and I was able to build and >> exercise the code

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

2019-10-09 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Il mer 9 ott 2019, 21:14 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > +1 checksums/sig validated. rat ran clean and I was able to build and > exercise the code just fine with java 8. > > Note dep check is failing again however: > > jackson-databind-2.9.10.jar >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

2019-10-09 Thread Patrick Hunt
+1 checksums/sig validated. rat ran clean and I was able to build and exercise the code just fine with java 8. Note dep check is failing again however: jackson-databind-2.9.10.jar (pkg:maven/com.fasterxml.jackson.core/jackson-databind@2.9.10, cpe:2.3:a:fasterxml:jackson:2.9.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*,

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

2019-10-09 Thread Andor Molnar
I hope we don’t have to create another RC because of this… Andor > On 2019. Oct 9., at 18:08, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Il mer 9 ott 2019, 17:55 Jordan Zimmerman ha > scritto: > >> It's required by the Apache Release process: >> >> http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution < >>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

2019-10-09 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Il mer 9 ott 2019, 17:55 Jordan Zimmerman ha scritto: > It's required by the Apache Release process: > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution < > http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution> > > For every artifact distributed to the public through Apache channels, the > PMC > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

2019-10-09 Thread Andor Molnar
Yeah, we supply SHA512 sum and GPG signature for the tarballs. But I don’t think we need to supply checksum for the GPG signatures too. Here: https://archive.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/zookeeper-3.5.5/ Andor > On 2019. Oct 9., at 17:54, Jordan Zimmerman > wrote: > > It's required by the

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

2019-10-09 Thread Jordan Zimmerman
It's required by the Apache Release process: http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution For every artifact distributed to the public through Apache channels, the PMC • MUST supply a valid OpenPGP-compatible ASCII-armored detached

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

2019-10-09 Thread Andor Molnar
Checking. Why do we generated SHA512 sums for the gpg signatures? Is that intentional? Andor > On 2019. Oct 8., at 22:36, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.5.6. > > It fixes 29 issues, including upgrade of third party libraries, > TTL Node APIs for C API,