On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:34 PM Michael Han wrote:
> Since pkg-config has been available for a long time, what's the drawback in
> terms of compatibilities if we choose only support pkg-config moving
> forward?
>
>
It could break existing downstream build infra. Also the issue is not super
Since pkg-config has been available for a long time, what's the drawback in
terms of compatibilities if we choose only support pkg-config moving
forward?
For cmake, if we choose only to support cmake, then that's another
dependency users that consumes release tarball have to install on their OS
Does anybody else has strong or not that strong opinion?
Andor
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 8:30 PM, Andor Molnar wrote:
> What do you think @andschwa?
> You did some contribution on CMake recently.
>
> Andor
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 8:09 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>
>> Hm. Not directly on
What do you think @andschwa?
You did some contribution on CMake recently.
Andor
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 8:09 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Hm. Not directly on point but related - should we move off auto* tools at
> some point and just use cmake? (which is already in the codebase) Or some
> other
Hm. Not directly on point but related - should we move off auto* tools at
some point and just use cmake? (which is already in the codebase) Or some
other option?
Patrick
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 11:05 AM Andor Molnar
wrote:
> "When is pkg-config needed?"
>
> Both. You need the macro to generate
"When is pkg-config needed?"
Both. You need the macro to generate ./configure and you need pkg-config
and cppunit.pc (part of cppunit package) to compile the tests.
"Do we already do something special like generate the configure script and
ship that as part of the release?"
That's correct. We
When is pkg-config needed? If you want to compile from source or if you
want to compile from the release artifact? Do we already do something
special like generate the configure script and ship that as part of the
release?
Patrick
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 6:44 AM Andor Molnar wrote:
> This PR is
This PR is also related:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/362
Andor
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 3:18 PM, Andor Molnar wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> I'm having problems resolving the issue mentioned in this Jira and need
> some feedback from you:
>
>
Hi devs,
I'm having problems resolving the issue mentioned in this Jira and need
some feedback from you:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3034
In a nutshell the situation with *cppunit* is as follows:
LibreOffice team confirmed that from version *1.14.0* they will no longer
ship
