Re: github.com zookeeper pull requests in "limbo"

Looks like lucene/solr stuck with patches attached to jiras: https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/HowToContribute Same with Hadoop https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute#Making_Changes Patrick On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Hm. Looks pretty

Re: github.com zookeeper pull requests in "limbo"

Hm. Looks pretty straightforward - although in our case we have to consider that git repos already exist (for bk it was new). From the lucene infra jira it looks like they said to recreate the git repo and mirror. The additional side effect of doing that would be that all the "limbo" PRs will get

Re: github.com zookeeper pull requests in "limbo"

Right, we moved to a git repo when the project became TLP: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8701 -Flavio > On 10 Mar 2016, at 17:12, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > Hm, that seems to be about github integration, see this

Re: github.com zookeeper pull requests in "limbo"

Hm, that seems to be about github integration, see this for what lucene/solr recently did: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11056 "Migrate Lucene project from SVN to Git." I'm also +1 for git. Patrick On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > Here

Re: github.com zookeeper pull requests in "limbo"

Here is the infra ticket for bookkeeper: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10679 -Flavio > On 10 Mar 2016, at 16:27, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés wrote: > > I am +1 on moving to git as well. > > What did it take

Re: github.com zookeeper pull requests in "limbo"

I am +1 on moving to git as well. What did it take for other Apache projects? -rgs On Mar 10, 2016 7:09 AM, "Flavio Junqueira" wrote: > I'd like to move to git... > > -Flavio > > > On 10 Mar 2016, at 15:07, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > > I could see us turning

Re: github.com zookeeper pull requests in "limbo"

I'd like to move to git... -Flavio > On 10 Mar 2016, at 15:07, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > I could see us turning it on if we move to git as our source repo. > However I'm recommending we turn it _off_ until then. Interestingly > there's a discussion going on right now in apache

Re: github.com zookeeper pull requests in "limbo"

I could see us turning it on if we move to git as our source repo. However I'm recommending we turn it _off_ until then. Interestingly there's a discussion going on right now in apache infra about this (github mirrors and PRs), I'll let you know. That said, is there any interest to move to git

Re: github.com zookeeper pull requests in "limbo"

I did mean turning it on, which is apparently the opposite of what Pat is proposing. Sorry about the confusion. =) -Flavio > On 10 Mar 2016, at 08:01, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés wrote: > > On Mar 9, 2016 11:26 PM, "Flavio Junqueira" wrote: >> >> +1 for

Re: github.com zookeeper pull requests in "limbo"

On Mar 9, 2016 11:26 PM, "Flavio Junqueira" wrote: > > +1 for accepting requesting to infra to accept PRs via github. We've done the transition in BookKeeper and have been doing it in Kafka for a while, it works pretty well. Wait - you mean the other way around? Pat suggested

Re: github.com zookeeper pull requests in "limbo"

+1 for accepting requesting to infra to accept PRs via github. We've done the transition in BookKeeper and have been doing it in Kafka for a while, it works pretty well. I'm happy you brought this up, Pay, I've been thinking about it. -Flavio > On 10 Mar 2016, at 00:38, Patrick Hunt

Re: github.com zookeeper pull requests in "limbo"

I'll start responding to some of these with a link to the HTC page to help get it done. C On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Hi folks. If you look on github.com you'll see a number of pull > request (41 atm) that are effectively in limbo given we don't