Am 22.12.2011 um 01:19 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>
>>> PS. I hope that in 2012 I've redone all the code (consistency, mkiv'd,
>>> namespaces, etc).
>>
>> Can we now consider the following prefixes for registers as the suggested
>> method to name t
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 22.12.2011 um 01:19 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
PS. I hope that in 2012 I've redone all the code (consistency, mkiv'd,
namespaces, etc).
Can we now consider the following prefixes for registers as
Am 22.12.2011 um 01:19 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>
>>> PS. I hope that in 2012 I've redone all the code (consistency, mkiv'd,
>>> namespaces, etc).
>>
>> Can we now consider the following prefixes for registers as the suggested
>> method to name t
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
PS. I hope that in 2012 I've redone all the code (consistency, mkiv'd,
namespaces, etc).
Can we now consider the following prefixes for registers as the suggested
method to name them:
\newcount: \c_…
\newdimen: \d_…
\newskip: \s_…
\newbox: \b_…
Hi Hans,
the \margindata commands still used the no longer available \dosetupstrut
command.
Wolfgang
___
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context
Am 21.12.2011 um 23:26 schrieb Hans Hagen:
> Hi Wolfgang et al,
>
> I cleaned up mkiv'd pack-rul, meta-ini, anch-pgr etc and for sure there have
> been bugs introduced. A couple of mkii artefacts have been removed and some
> speedups were possible (important as framed is a core macro so especi
Hi Wolfgang et al,
I cleaned up mkiv'd pack-rul, meta-ini, anch-pgr etc and for sure there
have been bugs introduced. A couple of mkii artefacts have been removed
and some speedups were possible (important as framed is a core macro so
especially backgrounds have been redone a bit). I still hav