Re: [dev-context] mathpairs

2017-08-06 Thread Aditya Mahajan
Hi, I tested with the latest beta and everything works well. Can you also add a virtual character for --. Then I can add the mappings for -->, <--. Others that can be mapped are ::, ::=, -: for which I am attaching a patch file. Aditya--- char-def.lua 2017-08-06 17:36:02.0 -0400 +

Re: [dev-context] mathpairs

2017-08-06 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Sun, 6 Aug 2017, Hans Hagen wrote: On 8/5/2017 6:53 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Sat, 5 Aug 2017, Aditya Mahajan wrote: := \colonequals =: \equalscolon BTW, should we remove the definitions of \colonequals, \equalcolons, and \minuscolon from math-def.mkiv? i'll comment them ... how a

Re: [dev-context] mathpairs

2017-08-06 Thread Hans Hagen
On 8/5/2017 6:53 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Sat, 5 Aug 2017, Aditya Mahajan wrote: := \colonequals =: \equalscolon BTW, should we remove the definitions of \colonequals, \equalcolons, and \minuscolon from math-def.mkiv? i'll comment them ... how about the others .. i can make them into

Re: [dev-context] mathpairs

2017-08-04 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Sat, 5 Aug 2017, Aditya Mahajan wrote: := \colonequals =: \equalscolon BTW, should we remove the definitions of \colonequals, \equalcolons, and \minuscolon from math-def.mkiv? Aditya ___ dev-context mailing list dev-context@ntg.nl https://mai

[dev-context] mathpairs

2017-08-04 Thread Aditya Mahajan
Hi Hans, Currently the following mathpairs are defined: := \colonequals =: \equalscolon <= \le = \ge != \neq Are these all? (Why is != defined using specials?) Does it make sense to define others? I can think of the following: << \ll \gg <<< \lll \ggg == \equiv In addition, we c