- Original Message -
> I'd really like to see the agenda for this meeting to be finalized a
> day
> or so in advance so that I can decide whether what's going to be
> discussed in the meeting interests me or not. Do you think doing
> that
> would make sense?
I would also prefer an agend
I'd really like to see the agenda for this meeting to be finalized a day
or so in advance so that I can decide whether what's going to be
discussed in the meeting interests me or not. Do you think doing that
would make sense?
Cheers,
Ehsan
On 2013-05-28 5:10 PM, Lawrence Mandel wrote:
tl;dr
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert O'Callahan"
> To: "Jonathan Watt"
> Cc: dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 10:11:55 PM
> Subject: Re: Extending the text-overflow/overflow property to support fading
> out
>
> I'm pretty sure an unconditional mask with a
tl;dr The platform meeting will revert to focus on engineering teams as of next
week.
We discussed the platform meeting's use during today's platform meeting. The
consensus of the people who attended the meeting is that the platform meeting
is useful and should be continued. Here is my summary
Hi Isaac,
What I meant by "matter of taste" is that while some people find advanced
presentation styles, such as the one you mention, useful, other people find
them to be just toys. I belong to the latter category, but have no hope of
convincing everyone else of my views, so I'd rather just call i
Hi Benoit,
> When I started this thread, I didn't even conceive that one would want to
> apply style to individual pieces of an equation. Someone gave the example
> of applying a color to e.g. a square root sign, to highlight it; I don't
> believe much in the pedagogic value of this kind of tricks
On 2013-05-27 10:54 PM, Anthony Jones wrote:
A pre-upload check would give the fastest feedback.
It would help me (and those who review my code) if there is an easy way
to check my patches from the command line before doing hg bzexport. Even
if it is only for white space. What we need is a way t
On 5/24/2013 10:50 AM, Justin Lebar wrote:
* I think we should experiment (again) with real pull-request integration
into bugzilla.
I'm totally in favor of better tools and real pull requests, and of
course the PRs need to be linked to bugzilla /somehow/.
But I want to qualify "integration into
δΊ 2012/9/27 9:12, Gregory Szorc ει:
The next time you pull mozilla-central, you'll find a new tool in the
root directory: mach
$ ./mach build
Well, when I try mach build on Win8 x64 and use VC2010 Chinese Edition
compiler, its output information (Chinese information) will be messy:
make b
Hello,
Is there a way to disable the spellcheck in XULRunner ? If so, how ?
Thanks
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
2013/5/28 Henri Sivonen
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Benoit Jacob
> wrote:
> > I also thought that it was obvious that a suitably chosen subset of TeX
> > could be free of such unwanted characteristics.
>
> So basically that would involve inventing something new that currently
> does not e
On 5/27/13 7:34 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> The alternative is to use C++ workers. This doesn't work for addons
> obviously, but those aren't yet a concern for B2G.
Well, my main concern is front-end- and add-on-accessible code.
Normally, it shouldn't influence B2G.
> Weren't we moving addons into
12 matches
Mail list logo
