I'm not too familiar with the "intent to ship" process for mozilla [1]
Given that no one objected to my proposal, can I submit a patch to remove
the runtime flag and put it up for review?
1: https://wiki.mozilla.org/WebAPI/ExposureGuidelines
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
On 3/25/14, 3:14 PM, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
With the completion of bug 981030 test harness options are now defined
in-tree.
This means any push without this patch [1] will fail. I already went
ahead and landed it on all release branches, but if you have an
integration or project branch, you m
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 6:18 AM, Botond Ballo wrote:
> Hello dev-platform,
>
> I recently fixed an APZ bug [1] that was caused by an IPDL message,
> PBrowser::UpdateFrame, being compressed when it shouldn't have been.
>
> I think the compression was correct back when we didn't have subframe
> scro
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Nicholas Nethercote
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Benjamin Smedberg
> wrote:
>>
>> What is the per-compartment overhead?
>
> It's hard to pin an exact number on it.
I talked to Bill about this today, and the overhead includes:
- The JSCompartment obj
During a Layout work week in Taipei last week, I gave a talk on:
(1) some bits of XPCOM and its history that I thought were worth
talking about
(2) our string APIs (a bit about what the internal string APIs do
and why and how to use them)
(roughly a half hour on each topic)
Since other
With the completion of bug 981030 test harness options are now defined
in-tree.
This means any push without this patch [1] will fail. I already went
ahead and landed it on all release branches, but if you have an
integration or project branch, you may need to merge m-c in (or cherry
pick that
On Friday, March 21, 2014 12:16:28 AM UTC-7, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> What other solutions besides concatenating files and lazy loading are there?
> Neither sound particularly appealing to me. I'd really like to be able to
> "pin" specific JSMs to shared compartments. Kind of a hybrid between CPG
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 03:18:19PM -0700, Botond Ballo wrote:
> Hello dev-platform,
>
> I recently fixed an APZ bug [1] that was caused by an IPDL message,
> PBrowser::UpdateFrame, being compressed when it shouldn't have been.
>
> I think the compression was correct back when we didn't have subfr
On 3/25/14 2:22 PM, Matthew Gertner wrote:
Is this a bug or am I misunderstanding something about the way the
"DOMWindowCreated" event works?
Is the url about:blank when the window is created, perhaps? It's hard
to say without knowing exactly what you're logging/measuring.
-Boris
_
I registered a "DOMWindowCreated" listener for a tabbrowser in a standard
browser.xul window. When I open www.khanacademy.org/login inside a tab, there
is a frame in the page with the URL www.khanacademy.org/login?form=1. The
listener seems to be fired for all other frames (including all other s
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> > The one shipping implementation was Safari and it was implemented last
> year
> > by Dirk. He renamed it last week to Path2D.
>
> I see, if it has been in Safari for over a year a
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> The one shipping implementation was Safari and it was implemented last year
> by Dirk. He renamed it last week to Path2D.
I see, if it has been in Safari for over a year as Path, the claims it
causes compatibility issues seem somewhat overblo
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:08 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
> Hi Anne,
> On Mar 25, 2014, at 11:29 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Rik Cabanier
> wrote:
> >> It's defined as the "Path" object in the WhatWG spec [1] but after a
> long
> >> discussion and author feedb
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Nicholas Nethercote
wrote:
>
> I should clarify: that's the memory consumption that's identified as
> belonging to the compartment, but that's not the whole picture. Some
> compartment data gets reported at the level of the runtime, including
> 'script-sources' and
Hi Anne,
On Mar 25, 2014, at 11:29 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
>> It's defined as the "Path" object in the WhatWG spec [1] but after a long
>> discussion and author feedback that name was considered too generic and
>> renamed.
>
> Pointer?
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> It's defined as the "Path" object in the WhatWG spec [1] but after a long
> discussion and author feedback that name was considered too generic and
> renamed.
Pointer? Almost none of the other -related interfaces have a
suffix. Also, if there
16 matches
Mail list logo
