Re: What are the most important new APIs to document in Q3/Q4?

2014-06-26 Thread Eric Shepherd
On 2014-06-26 23:07:40 +, Brian Birtles said: I hope to land parts of the Web Animations API during Q3 & Q4.[1] Not sure if it will get preffed on in that time frame but Chrome already has parts of the API so it may be worth starting on the docs for that. I'd be glad to help where I can.

Re: Follow up on clang-format

2014-06-26 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
On 22/05/2014 18:29, Anthony Jones wrote: > Some of you may remember the discussion on clang-format and the `mach > clang-format` command. What we have in place right now is very temporary > but it is functional enough to give it a try. I have not put the effort > into upstreaming my changes. Depen

What are the most important new APIs to document in Q3/Q4?

2014-06-26 Thread Robert Kaiser
Benoit Jacob schrieb: Not expressing any opinion on whether WebGL should be prioritized, but recently I had to teach some WebGL and, not being fully satisfied with existing tutorials, I made a code-only "tutorial" made of 12 increasingly involved WebGL examples, http://bjacob.github.io/webgl-tut

Re: What are the most important new APIs to document in Q3/Q4?

2014-06-26 Thread Johnny Stenback
ServiceWorkers! We're in the midst of implementing right now, current plan being to have all the pieces done and in m-c by end of Q3, with further work happening on refinement and performance work etc after that. The spec is still in flux, but I would expect it to be in a documentable form later th

Re: What are the most important new APIs to document in Q3/Q4?

2014-06-26 Thread Brian Birtles
On 2014/06/26 22:09, Eric Shepherd wrote: Hi! The docs team is trying to build our schedule for the next quarter or two, and part of that is deciding which APIs to spend lots of our time writing about. I'd like to know what y'all think the most important APIs are for docs attention in the next fe

Re: Intent to unimplement: proprietary window.crypto functions/properties

2014-06-26 Thread Eric Shepherd
On 2014-06-26 20:40:53 +, David Keeler said: We intend to remove the proprietary window.crypto functions and properties. See https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/JavaScript_crypto for what will be affected by this change. Yes! In related news, I've marked the bug for this dev-doc-nee

Re: What are the most important new APIs to document in Q3/Q4?

2014-06-26 Thread Eric Shepherd
On 2014-06-26 22:15:53 +, John Schoenick said: I hope to ship the element (currently pref'd off) soonish, and the usage can get somewhat complicated, so it might be nice to have. I was planning to take a shot at adding at least basic MDN content, but some docs team help would be awesome.

Re: What are the most important new APIs to document in Q3/Q4?

2014-06-26 Thread Eric Shepherd
On 2014-06-26 22:12:09 +, Benoit Jacob said: Not expressing any opinion on whether WebGL should be prioritized, but recently I had to teach some WebGL and, not being fully satisfied with existing tutorials, I made a code-only "tutorial" made of 12 increasingly involved WebGL examples, http:

Re: What are the most important new APIs to document in Q3/Q4?

2014-06-26 Thread Eric Shepherd
On 2014-06-26 22:00:29 +, dome...@domenicdenicola.com said: Today there were complaints about Web Audio documentation on Twitter, which I think were fair: https://twitter.com/thomasABoyt/status/482226291085946881 We have a writer actively working on major updates to our Web Audio API co

What are the most important new APIs to document in Q3/Q4?

2014-06-26 Thread John Schoenick
I hope to ship the element (currently pref'd off) soonish, and the usage can get somewhat complicated, so it might be nice to have. I was planning to take a shot at adding at least basic MDN content, but some docs team help would be awesome. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=pictur

Re: What are the most important new APIs to document in Q3/Q4?

2014-06-26 Thread paul
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014, at 12:00 AM, dome...@domenicdenicola.com wrote: > Today there were complaints about Web Audio documentation on Twitter, > which I think were fair: > > https://twitter.com/thomasABoyt/status/482226291085946881 I've received a (private) email from one of our doc person, asking

Re: What are the most important new APIs to document in Q3/Q4?

2014-06-26 Thread Benoit Jacob
2014-06-26 9:09 GMT-04:00 Eric Shepherd : > Hi! The docs team is trying to build our schedule for the next quarter or > two, and part of that is deciding which APIs to spend lots of our time > writing about. I'd like to know what y'all think the most important APIs > are for docs attention in the

Re: What are the most important new APIs to document in Q3/Q4?

2014-06-26 Thread domenic
Today there were complaints about Web Audio documentation on Twitter, which I think were fair: https://twitter.com/thomasABoyt/status/482226291085946881 ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-

Re: What are the most important new APIs to document in Q3/Q4?

2014-06-26 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
I can think of EME, the Mobile ID API, and WebCrypto which are missing from this list off the top of my head. Cheers, Ehsan On 2014-06-26, 6:09 AM, Eric Shepherd wrote: Hi! The docs team is trying to build our schedule for the next quarter or two, and part of that is deciding which APIs to spe

Re: Intent to unimplement: proprietary window.crypto functions/properties

2014-06-26 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
Yes, please! With WebCrypto being implemented, there is very little reason for us to keep these functions around. I have heard that there are some enterprise applications that use these APIs and hopefully they will have enough time to migrate away from using them by the time that we ship Fire

Intent to unimplement: proprietary window.crypto functions/properties

2014-06-26 Thread David Keeler
[dev.platform cc'd for visibility - please follow-up to dev.tech.crypto] Summary: We intend to remove the proprietary window.crypto functions and properties. See https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/JavaScript_crypto for what will be affected by this change. Our reasoning is as follows: These

Re: BzAPI Compatibility API has been rolled out to production BMO

2014-06-26 Thread Mark Côté
On 2014-06-25, 3:21 PM, jmor...@mozilla.com wrote: > This is terrific! > > The docs make mention of POST under bz_rest_options. Do you now (or will you > at some point) support bug creation via API? Would you do full CRUD at some > point? Yes, the native REST API already supports bug creation

Re: Difference from System.Web and System.Net

2014-06-26 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
I believe you are on the wrong mailing list! On 2014-06-26, 5:49 AM, Alonze wrote: Excuse me, could anyone explain me a concept of the differnce between System.Web and System.Net? And how to use two of these? Thank you, Aom ___ dev-platform maili

Session Restore (sessionstore)

2014-06-26 Thread Tobias Besemer
A new topic to move the discussions from the bugs to this group. Bug 669034 - (sessionRestoreJank) [meta] Re-architect session restore to avoid periodic freezes https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=669034 Bug 810932 - Investigate how to redesign sessionstore.js for improved performance

Re: Are you interested in doing dynamic analysis of JS code?

2014-06-26 Thread martin . johns
This is music to my ears :) Especially the combination of taint analysis with code coverage would be extremely helpful. The main drawback of dynamic security testing is the uncertainty how reliable/complete the achieved results are (opposed to static analysis, where you know exactly how much co

Re: Are you interested in doing dynamic analysis of JS code?

2014-06-26 Thread Nicolas B. Pierron
On 06/26/2014 04:59 AM, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote: I would be interested in adding boundary checks and invariant checks that could be eliminated in opt builds. Is this in the scope of your project? From an analysis point of view I am not sure to see how useful such information would be.

What are the most important new APIs to document in Q3/Q4?

2014-06-26 Thread Eric Shepherd
Hi! The docs team is trying to build our schedule for the next quarter or two, and part of that is deciding which APIs to spend lots of our time writing about. I'd like to know what y'all think the most important APIs are for docs attention in the next few months. Here are a few possibilities

Difference from System.Web and System.Net

2014-06-26 Thread Alonze
Excuse me, could anyone explain me a concept of the differnce between System.Web and System.Net? And how to use two of these? Thank you, Aom ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platfor

Re: Are you interested in doing dynamic analysis of JS code?

2014-06-26 Thread David Rajchenbach-Teller
I would be interested in adding boundary checks and invariant checks that could be eliminated in opt builds. Is this in the scope of your project? On 25/06/14 17:15, Jason Orendorff wrote: > We're considering building a JavaScript API for dynamic analysis of JS > code. > Here's the sort of thing y

Re: Are you interested in doing dynamic analysis of JS code?

2014-06-26 Thread Nicolas B. Pierron
Hi, On 06/25/2014 05:02 PM, Manu Sridharan wrote: I'm one of the maintainers of the Jalangi dynamic analysis framework for JavaScript: https://github.com/SRA-SiliconValley/jalangi I would be happy to discuss the way we can integrate such API in Firefox. As currently we are not yet settled o

Re: Test failures in mochitest-browser caused by doing work inside DOM event handlers

2014-06-26 Thread Chris Mills
On 25 Jun 2014, at 15:18, Ed Morley wrote: > On 25/06/2014 15:16:04, Chris Mills wrote: >> It looks like a good place to put this information would be as a subsection >> of >> https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Mochitest#Writing_tests >> >> Can you add in a brief section covering this point