On 07/04/2015 23:41, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Gavin Sharp wrote:
We don't have telemetry yet. I've done some measurements and haven't
found
any cases where tab switching consistently takes longer in e10s. However,
it's certainly possible that it does on averag
Yes they are built on the same SPS profiler backend.
However, the gecko profiler addon will do things the builtin devtools
can't, like open a shell and call `atos` to symbolicate C++ function
addresses.
See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1132529 for some context.
For the time being
I sometimes ask users to test a try build to verify that the build fixes their
problem. This is an important tool, especially when the problem is hard to
reproduce or when the definition of “fix” is a bit nebulous (as it sometimes is
in performance-related bugs).
However, I don’t want to run th
On 2015-04-08 3:08 PM, Seth Fowler wrote:
Can we do this?
Any better ideas?
I filed 1013371 a while back asking for something not quite identical
that might meet your needs.
"Automatically create clean profiles when -P specifies nonexistent profile."
- mhoye
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/
On Wednesday 2015-04-08 12:08 -0700, Seth Fowler wrote:
> I think one way we could reduce the burden on users would be to just make try
> builds default to a different profile than channel builds.
Is there a simple patch one could push to change this default, and
just include on any try pushes wh
> 2. The the schema version for all databases has changed, so once you open a
> database on trunk builds and it upgrades you will not be able to open that
> same database in an aurora/beta/release build.
Have we considered issuing a warning saying that after upgrading the
profile, it will not be
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Botond Ballo wrote:
> Have we considered issuing a warning saying that after upgrading the
> profile, it will not be compatible with older versions?
I would really like to have something like this. WebIDE makes use of
IndexedDB today, and it seems to trigger uncatc
This is a good idea.
On 08/04/15 21:30, Botond Ballo wrote:
2. The the schema version for all databases has changed, so once you open a
database on trunk builds and it upgrades you will not be able to open that same
database in an aurora/beta/release build.
Have we considered issuing a warnin
I think you can get this fairly easily by just changing one of the
values (Vendor or Name) in build/application.ini such that a different
profile folder is used.
Gavin
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:28 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
> On Wednesday 2015-04-08 12:08 -0700, Seth Fowler wrote:
>> I think one
There is also an old, unmaintained GUI for managing profiles:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Profile_Manager
It still works, although there are a few bugs. It may be an improvement
over command-line arguments for less technical users.
Jonathan
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Gavin Sh
+1000
I am constantly killing my profile by downgrading it when I need to test
something on Firefox Stable. Switching between Chrome releases couldnt be
easier but even as a Firefox Dev switching between profiles when testing a
different version is a nightmare, I cant imagine how unfriendly it is
EventModifierInit is a dictionary to initialize modifier state at
creating untrusted event. This allows to initialize "AltGraph",
"CapsLock", "Fn", "FnLock", "Hyper", "NumLock", "OS", "ScrollLock",
"Super", "Symbol" and "SymboleLock" state of creating events and it has
been no way to initializ
On 4/6/15 8:11 AM, Eric Shepherd (Sheppy) wrote:
Is it worth talking to someone from the TenFourFox project
(http://www.floodgap.com/software/tenfourfox/) to see if they have an
opinion on this? They may be using Shark still for their debugging and
testing processes.
I responded in the bug, bu
W3C recently published the following proposed recommendation (the
stage before W3C's final stage, Recommendation):
HTML5 Web Messaging
http://www.w3.org/TR/webmessaging/
There's a call for review to W3C member companies (of which Mozilla
is one) open until Tuesday, May 5.
If there are commen
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Gavin Sharp wrote:
> I think you can get this fairly easily by just changing one of the
> values (Vendor or Name) in build/application.ini such that a different
> profile folder is used.
>
If I were a user who wants to test the build, I don't want to see this, as
My concern with an approach like this is that it’s opt-in, and developers may
not necessarily keep this issue in mind every time they offer a build for
someone to try.
I’ve seen other developers suggest that users experiment with try builds, but
I’m not sure how widespread it is. Probably sugge
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 12:08:27PM -0700, Seth Fowler wrote:
> > I sometimes ask users to test a try build to verify that the build
> > fixes their problem. This is an important tool, especially when the
> > problem is hard to reproduce or when
On 09/04/15 15:39, Seth Fowler wrote:
> Sounds like yet another reason to build support and UI for this stuff
> directly into the browser.
On that note, Bram from UX has some ideas about what it could look like:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Contextual_Identity_Project/User_Profiles
Franco
> On Apr 8, 2015, at 8:37 PM, Nicholas Alexander wrote:
>
> It's quite important for Firefox for Android that try builds look and behave
> exactly like Nightly builds. On Android, it's not really possible to
> move/copy/duplicate profiles, and it's rocket science to do it across
> products (
I wrote a very simple addition to HTTP/1.1 in which I plan to draft as a RFC
soon, which allows multiplexing, prevents HOL blocking, and allows server
pushing in HTTP/1.1.
HPack could also be incorporated, via negotiation.
The idea?
A request begins by adding a header: X-Req-ID, set to a connecti
Hi Seth, others,
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Seth Fowler wrote:
> I sometimes ask users to test a try build to verify that the build fixes
> their problem. This is an important tool, especially when the problem is
> hard to reproduce or when the definition of “fix” is a bit nebulous (as it
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Gavin Sharp wrote:
>
> I think that's overthinking it - I doubt Seth was intending to distribute
> these builds widely or frequently. A few leftover profile files won't hurt
> anyone :)
>
It wouldn't be distributed widely, but could be frequently if it becomes a
c
As of 2015-04-15 I intend to turn identity for WebRTC on by default.
It has been developed behind the media.peerconnection.identity.enabled
preference. Firefox will be the first to implement this; I have only
informal promises from Google to implement once we ship.
This feature is the mutual authe
My bad, here's the bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1152538
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> As of 2015-04-15 I intend to turn identity for WebRTC on by default.
> It has been developed behind the media.peerconnection.identity.enabled
> preference. Firefox
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 08:48:32AM +1200, Xidorn Quan wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Gavin Sharp wrote:
>
> > I think you can get this fairly easily by just changing one of the
> > values (Vendor or Name) in build/application.ini such that a different
> > profile folder is used.
> >
>
I think that's overthinking it - I doubt Seth was intending to distribute these
builds widely or frequently. A few leftover profile files won't hurt anyone :)
Gavin
> On Apr 8, 2015, at 1:48 PM, Xidorn Quan wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Gavin Sharp wrote:
>> I think you can get
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 12:08:27PM -0700, Seth Fowler wrote:
> I sometimes ask users to test a try build to verify that the build
> fixes their problem. This is an important tool, especially when the
> problem is hard to reproduce or when the definition of “fix” is a bit
> nebulous (as it sometimes
27 matches
Mail list logo