> On Feb 27, 2016, at 9:43 AM, Mike de Boer wrote:
>
> It’s also about resources (read: money and other minor details). I think it’s
> very cool that Google is able to provide a good foundation for application
> frameworks like Electron with Chromium, however they don’t
We have a raft of intermittent oranges where we get "exit code -11".
I'm trying to land a patch, which is causing a largely-unrelated set of
tests (identity) to generate the infamous exit code -11 problem (there's
an existing intermittent filed against that test; it had disappeared for
months
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 4:33 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
> On 26/02/2016 22:45, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
> > To date, our continuous integration has been setting
> > 'xpinstall.signatures.required=false' to bypass addon signing. But
> > soon, this pref will become obsolete and
On 2016-02-27 10:09 AM, Jim Mathies wrote:
On Friday, February 26, 2016 at 5:58:54 PM UTC-6, William Lachance wrote:
Hey,
I wrote up a dashboard for tracking the performance delta between
non-e10s and e10s on the Talos tests on nightly:
https://treeherder.allizom.org/perf.html#/e10s
This is
On Friday, February 26, 2016 at 5:58:54 PM UTC-6, William Lachance wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I wrote up a dashboard for tracking the performance delta between
> non-e10s and e10s on the Talos tests on nightly:
>
> https://treeherder.allizom.org/perf.html#/e10s
This is great, thanks!
A couple
I was indeed working on such a project, codenamed ‘Chromeless2’. Then XULRunner
got deprecated and that meant that Chromeless2 lost its base building block.
I’m passionate about the potential of the platform as a means to bring the web
closer to the desktop, but the kind of pragmatism bringing
Unfortunately, this ship has sailed a long time ago. I didn't really
follow at the time, but I'm almost sure that there was a conscious
decision that Gecko == Firefoxen. While it makes the development of
Firefoxen easier, it pretty much killed the Mozilla Platform, including
embedding.
These
On 26/02/2016 22:45, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
> To date, our continuous integration has been setting
> 'xpinstall.signatures.required=false' to bypass addon signing. But
> soon, this pref will become obsolete and Firefox will enforce signing
> no matter what.
>
> In preparation, we will begin
On 27 February 2016 at 03:07, Myk Melez wrote:
> Nevertheless, the more significant factor is that this would be a cultural
> sea change in the Gecko project.
>
Eh? I didn't realise it was so radical.
My entire involvement with Mozilla and Mozilla technologies over the last
9 matches
Mail list logo