On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Benjamin Smedberg
> wrote:
> > I've been unhappy with the fact that our event loop uses refcounted
> objects
> > by default. *Most* runnables are pure-C++ and
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Benjamin Smedberg
wrote:
> I support this plan!
>
> Mostly.
>
> I've been unhappy with the fact that our event loop uses refcounted
> objects by default. *Most* runnables are pure-C++ and really don't need to
> be refcounted/scriptable.
>
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Bobby Holley wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Benjamin Smedberg
>> >
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Benjamin Smedberg
> > wrote:
> > > I've been unhappy with the fact that our event loop
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Benjamin Smedberg
> wrote:
> > I've been unhappy with the fact that our event loop uses refcounted
> objects
> > by default. *Most* runnables are pure-C++ and
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Benjamin Smedberg
wrote:
> I've been unhappy with the fact that our event loop uses refcounted objects
> by default. *Most* runnables are pure-C++ and really don't need to be
> refcounted/scriptable.
I've been thinking about this too. gfx
On 2016-03-29 5:19 PM, Kyle Huey wrote:
For when you are too lazy to type MOZ_ALWAYS_TRUE(NS_SUCCEEDS(foo)).
Any chance we can get this on a t-shirt?
- mhoye
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
In the department-of-paying-down-technical-debt, I'm planning to remove
much of the Chromium event loop over the next few months. You can follow
along in bug 1260828.
The rough outline:
Step 1: Replace Task with nsIRunnable, without changing any other
semantics. This will happen in late April,
Darn it, I caught and fixed that when I posted the link in the tracking bug
for 2.2.0 but missed it in this post. Anyway, the installer is signed by
MoCo for this release, so you can verify that what you downloaded is legit
that way. Also, you can verify that the sha256 hash is
Hi Emma,
for those of us that are addicted to data: You have about a 1000 bugs of
data, and I'd love to hear some of the good parts, and maybe also some
of the bad parts.
Also, you tested on three teams, and you report a success story from
one. Could you frame that a bit? Is that within the
10 matches
Mail list logo