Our comments mostly try to follow the Doxygen format, and MDN says
that the documentation team has a tool for importing Doxygen-formatted
IDL comments into MDN articles.
Other than that, is Doxygen output from m-c input being published anywhere?
https://people-mozilla.org/~bgirard/doxygen/gfx/ is
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Botond Ballo wrote:
> In the case of begin() and end(), it's not just a matter of style.
It seems that nsTArray, too, mixes these into a class that otherwise
follows Mozilla naming, so I guess we have enough precedent for using
the standard-library naming for iter
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:18 AM, smaug wrote:
> I don't care too much about &&/|| coding style, though the current style
> does feel easier to
> read, per the reasoning dmajor gave.
I suspect that a lot of people think this way. While it's tempting to
suggest that arguments like "that's the way
Hi,
In order to reduce the performance issues caused by sync IPC messages,
we are tracking and removing sync IPCs from the content process or the
UI thread[1]. With bug 1336919 landed[[2] all additions of new sync
messages must be recorded in ipc/ipdl/sync-messages.ini and reviewed by
an IPC peer.
On 02/18/2017 07:08 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
I'd also note that if we're not going to use "this is what we have done
historically"
as a guide, then it seems like much bigger changes are on the table and we
would probably be better off adopting some other well-defined coding
standard
wholesale (e
5 matches
Mail list logo
