Re: Implementing a Chrome DevTools Protocol server in Firefox

On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 7:36 AM, David Burns wrote: > I don't think anyone would disagree with the reasons for doing this. I, like James who brought it up earlier, am concerned that we from the emails appear to think that implementing the wire protocol would be sufficient to

Re: Implementing a Chrome DevTools Protocol server in Firefox

I don't think anyone would disagree with the reasons for doing this. I, like James who brought it up earlier, am concerned that we from the emails appear to think that implementing the wire protocol would be sufficient to making sure we have the same semantics. As mentioned by Karl earlier, it

Re: Eiminating nsIDOM* interfaces and brand checks

On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > Thoughts? It really would be nice to get rid of some of this stuff going > forward. And since the web platform seems to be punting on branding, > there's no existing solution we can use. It's punting on exposing it to web

[Firefox Desktop] Issues found: August 28th to September 1st

Hi everyone, Here's the list of new issues found and filed by the Desktop Release QA Team last week, *August 28 - September 1* (week 35). Additional details on the team's priorities last week, as well as the plans for the current week are available at: