Re: overly strict eslint rules

On 03/01/2018 14:57, Mark Banner wrote: On 24/12/2017 22:07, Masatoshi Kimura wrote: --- $ mach lint browser/base/content/aboutDialog.js eslint-plugin-html v2.0.3 should be v4.0.0. ESLint is an old version, clobbering node_modules direc

Re: overly strict eslint rules

Not replying to anyone specifically, but Sylvestre's team is working on getting our linters hooked up to mozreview/phabricator as well. I think this paired with bootstrapping the hooks will smooth out the lint fixing workflow considerably. Andrew On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 5:58 AM Mark Banner wrote

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Second Screen Working Group

LGTM! On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 9:56 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > So I think Martin, Peter, and I share similar concerns here, and I'm > inclined to turn those concerns into an objection to this charter. > > So how does this sound for proposed comments on the charter > (submitted as a formal objecti

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Second Screen Working Group

Agreed. Thanks for the careful wording, David! (BTW s/apple/Apple/) On 1/5/18 9:08 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > LGTM! > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 9:56 PM, L. David Baron > wrote: > > So I think Martin, Peter, and I share similar concerns here, and I'm > inclined t

Re: Announcing the next Extended Support Release of Firefox - ESR60 with policy engine

On 04/01/2018 18:06, Tom Ritter wrote: I am curious what Enterprise users are asking for. I'd like to think/hope that a primary concern of enterprise is "Security" (or the separate topic of Privacy); but I'm not certain it is. In particular, I am curious if enterprise users would be interested

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Second Screen Working Group

So after a little off-list discussion with SC, I have a somewhat revised proposal for comments that perhaps proposes what might be a more acceptable remedy (although thanks to timezones I don't actually know what SC thinks of this proposal). -David = The current situation with the API develo

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Second Screen Working Group

Looks good. Thanks, David! On 1/5/18 1:58 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > So after a little off-list discussion with SC, I have a somewhat > revised proposal for comments that perhaps proposes what might be a > more acceptable remedy (although thanks to timezones I don't > actually know what SC thinks

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Second Screen Working Group

This is an improvement and I think has a better chance of effecting change with the specific proposals. We're still making this an FO right? (I think we should) perhaps: s/We would ask that:/We ask (formal objection) that: Your "open to other paths" closing statement provides an out to resolvin