Re: Faster gecko builds with IceCC on Mac and Linux

2016-07-06 Thread Chris H-C
a Telemetry-like system for mach and the build > system. > > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Chris H-C <chut...@mozilla.com> wrote: > >> Are there any scripts for reporting, analysing build times reported by >> mach? I think this would be really useful data

Re: Faster gecko builds with IceCC on Mac and Linux

2016-07-06 Thread Chris H-C
Are there any scripts for reporting, analysing build times reported by mach? I think this would be really useful data to have, especially to track build system improvements (and regressions) as well as poorly-supported configurations. Chris On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 7:42 PM, Gregory Szorc

Re: MXR permanently offline, please transition to DXR

2016-07-05 Thread Chris H-C
For now, can we get https://mxr.mozilla.org/ to point to something other than the "Repairs in Progress" hardhat? A redirect to dxr would not be amiss, methinks. On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Panos Astithas wrote: > It seems like the awesomebar could at least help you by

Re: Basic Auth Prevalence (was Re: Intent to ship: Treat cookies set over non-secure HTTP as session cookies)

2016-06-21 Thread Chris H-C
I concur. 1 in every 12 loads require an HTTP auth prompt? Seems very high. Visual inspection of the probe implementations [1] [2] show no obvious faults, so I'm not sure what's going on here. [1]

Re: How badly out of date is this?

2016-06-01 Thread Chris H-C
position:fixed can be a usability nightmare on mobile. Here be dragons. On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Kartikaya Gupta wrote: > Or make the warning a fixed-position item, so it's on-screen > regardless of where on the page you are. > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Mike

Re: How do we measure active users on a given architecture?

2016-05-25 Thread Chris H-C
be a > good time. > > In the meantime, to that specific question: I got that information from > Chris H-C, and I bet he could answer your followup question in no time. > > Red rover, red rover, I call chutten over. > > - mhoye > > ___

Re: Moving XP to ESR?

2016-04-21 Thread Chris H-C
> * Lack of SSE2, though not an XP problem per se, coincides with XP, so we could just require SSE2 if we didn't support XP. We have data about this. Unfortunately we'd also have to kick out some Windows 7 users. For every ten WinXP Firefox users without SSE2 we have a Win7 Firefox user without

Re: Moving XP to ESR?

2016-04-20 Thread Chris H-C
> I wonder how much of the marketshare is likely XP SP2. According to the longitudinal dataset, SP2 is roughly 16% of the Windows XP population, with the rest SP3. So, still some millions of users. :chutten On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Mike Conley wrote: > The people

Re: Does SSE2 usage still need to be conditional?

2016-02-03 Thread Chris H-C
So I reran the analysis, this time breaking down by OS the users who we can't say for certain have SSE2: https://gist.github.com/chutten/e4ccd0d5a46b782bae53 This was on a 25% sample of users reporting in from release Firefox on Jan 21. The tl;dr is that it's mostly WinXP. So much so that it's

Re: Does SSE2 usage still need to be conditional?

2016-01-29 Thread Chris H-C
tl;dr - Around 99.5% of Firefox Desktop clients on release channel represented by (a 20% sample of) pings submitted by on January 21, 2016 had "hasSSE2" detected. Here's the analysis and results on github. Please feel free to check my work: https://gist.github.com/chutten/4959c873d7fbbec0785a

Want a custom Telemetry Dashboard? Dashboard Generator.

2015-12-01 Thread Chris H-C
here: https://github.com/mozilla/telemetry-dashboard/issues Chris H-C ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform