I concur. 1 in every 12 loads require an HTTP auth prompt? Seems very high.
Visual inspection of the probe implementations [1] [2] show no obvious
faults, so I'm not sure what's going on here.

[1]
https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/netwerk/protocol/http/nsHttpChannelAuthProvider.cpp#782
[2]
https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/netwerk/protocol/http/nsHttpChannel.cpp#1608

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 7:22 AM, David Burns <dbu...@mozilla.com> wrote:

> Is there a way that we can gather if people are using this for testing web
> sites? This might account for those numbers.
>
> For example, there is basic support, and I mean really basic support, in
> Selenium to handle Basic auth and we suggest to people that setting up a
> proxy in the middle to handle that handshake. I suspect in these cases
> people won't have all the necessary security setup if it is behind some
> kind of firewall. Just a thought.
>
> David
>
> On 11 June 2016 at 03:27, Jason Duell <jdu...@mozilla.com> wrote:
>
> > This data also smells weird to me.  8% of pages using basic auth seems
> very
> > very high, and only 0.7% of basic auth being done unencypted seems low.
> >
> > Perhaps we should chat in London (ideally with Honza Bambas) and make
> sure
> > we're getting the telemetry right here.
> >
> > Jason
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Adam Roach <a...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On 4/18/16 09:59, Richard Barnes wrote:
> > >
> > >> Could we just disable HTTP auth for connections not protected with
> TLS?
> > >> At
> > >> least Basic auth is manifestly insecure over an insecure transport.  I
> > >> don't have any usage statistics, but I suspect it's pretty low
> compared
> > to
> > >> form-based auth.
> > >>
> > >
> > > As a follow up from this: we added telemetry to answer the exact
> question
> > > about how prevalent Basic auth over non-TLS connections was. Now that
> 49
> > is
> > > off Nightly, I pulled the stats for our new little counter.
> > >
> > > It would appear telemetry was enabled for approximately 109M page
> > > loads[1], of which approximately 8.7M[2] used HTTP auth -- or
> > approximately
> > > 8% of all pages. (This is much higher than I expected -- approximately
> 1
> > > out of 12 page loads uses HTTP auth? It seems far less dead than we
> > > anticipated).
> > >
> > > 749k of those were unencrypted basic auth[2]; this constitutes
> > > approximately 0.7% of all recorded traffic.
> > >
> > > I'll look at the 49 Aurora stats when it has enough data -- it'll be
> > > interesting to see how much if it is nontrivially different.
> > >
> > > /a
> > >
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> >
> https://telemetry.mozilla.org/new-pipeline/dist.html#!cumulative=0&end_date=2016-06-06&keys=__none__!__none__!__none__&max_channel_version=nightly%252F49&measure=HTTP_PAGELOAD_IS_SSL&min_channel_version=null&product=Firefox&sanitize=1&sort_keys=submissions&start_date=2016-05-04&table=0&trim=1&use_submission_date=0
> > >
> > > [2]
> > >
> >
> https://telemetry.mozilla.org/new-pipeline/dist.html#!cumulative=0&end_date=2016-06-06&keys=__none__!__none__!__none__&max_channel_version=nightly%252F49&measure=HTTP_AUTH_TYPE_STATS&min_channel_version=null&product=Firefox&sanitize=1&sort_keys=submissions&start_date=2016-05-04&table=0&trim=1&use_submission_date=0
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Adam Roach
> > > Principal Platform Engineer
> > > Office of the CTO
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > dev-platform mailing list
> > > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> > > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Jason
> > _______________________________________________
> > dev-platform mailing list
> > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
> >
> _______________________________________________
> dev-platform mailing list
> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
>
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to