cided to mark 10.7 or 10.8 as tier 2 or otherwise less
supported. I don't mind assuming that 10.6/10.9 tests oughta catch most of the
problems, but if they miss one and we break 10.7/10.8, I'd expect us to find a
solution for that, or back out if the bustage is significant and not easi
t finds a one-day range, and
then give you an hg-link to the range itself. Awfully helpful, and yet I'm
often surprised to find that people don't know about it.
J
---
Johnathan Nightingale
VP Firefox
@johnath
___
dev-platform
plan to make plugins click-to-play.
Benjamin blogged with what's actually happening:
https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2013/09/24/plugin-activation-in-firefox/
---
Johnathan Nightingale
VP Firefox
@johnath
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
(I like Ed's answer more, though)
On Aug 30, 2013, at 10:17 AM, Johnathan Nightingale wrote:
> I don't know if it will serve your purposes, but wiki.mo does have:
>
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Template:CURRENT_VERSION
>
> and derivatives:
>
> https://wiki.mo
not have to hand-edit that anymore.
>
> --
> Eric Shepherd
> Developer Documentation Lead
> Mozilla
> Blog: http://www.bitstampede.com/
> Twitter: @sheppy
>
> ___
> dev-platform mailing list
> dev-platform@lists.mozill
l).
J
[1] http://mozilla.github.io/process-releases/draft/development_overview/
Ancient, and shows it, but still relevant for this case. See "Moving work from
one channel to another"
---
Johnathan Nightingale
VP Firefox Engineering
@johnath
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
; in version numbers or checking for the latest updates. These users might be
> receptive to a channel upsell message to get an even bigger version number. :)
---
Johnathan Nightingale
VP Firefox Engineering
@johnath
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
re very much a thing that pushes those
users to launch another browser. Each time they do, there's some <100% chance
that we get them back. I know that the precautionary principle can be paralytic
but, in the absence of a significant win, I agree with Ehsan and Benjamin here
that I
again is the ideal.
Yeah, I think what's missing in the current proposal is a clear statement of
benefit. I agree that the downside seems small with this one.
J
---
Johnathan Nightingale
VP Firefox Engineering
@johnath
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
9 matches
Mail list logo