, but if they miss one and we break 10.7/10.8, I'd expect us to find a
solution for that, or back out if the bustage is significant and not easily
fixable.
J
---
Johnathan Nightingale
VP Firefox
@johnath
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform
an hg-link to the range itself. Awfully helpful, and yet I'm
often surprised to find that people don't know about it.
J
---
Johnathan Nightingale
VP Firefox
@johnath
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org
Mozilla
Blog: http://www.bitstampede.com/
Twitter: @sheppy
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
---
Johnathan Nightingale
VP Firefox Engineering
@johnath
(I like Ed's answer more, though)
On Aug 30, 2013, at 10:17 AM, Johnathan Nightingale wrote:
I don't know if it will serve your purposes, but wiki.mo does have:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Template:CURRENT_VERSION
and derivatives:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Template:BETA_VERSION
https
it, but still relevant for this case. See Moving work from
one channel to another
---
Johnathan Nightingale
VP Firefox Engineering
@johnath
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
to a channel upsell message to get an even bigger version number. :)
---
Johnathan Nightingale
VP Firefox Engineering
@johnath
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
they do, there's some 100% chance
that we get them back. I know that the precautionary principle can be paralytic
but, in the absence of a significant win, I agree with Ehsan and Benjamin here
that I'd much rather shim this than see what breaks.
J
---
Johnathan Nightingale
VP Firefox Engineering
.
J
---
Johnathan Nightingale
VP Firefox Engineering
@johnath
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
8 matches
Mail list logo