As a XULRunner app developer, as long as firefox -app application.ini continues
to work I think I could learn to live with this.
On Sunday, January 12, 2014 7:34:54 PM UTC-5, Mike Hommey wrote:
Hi,
Let's face it: xulrunner is hardly maintained, we barely build and test
it on
I want to be able to parse XML and expose the resulting document to a sandboxed
script. I do this by first by determining the principal corresponding to a
given URI:
var secMan = Services.scriptSecurityManager;
var uri = Services.io.newURI(http://www.example.com/;, UTF-8, null);
var principal =
Did you rebuild your automatically generated C++ headers using the
version of pyxpidl shipped with XULRunner 17? Details at
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/XPIDL/pyxpidl
On Nov 28, 1:48 pm, Felipe Junges felipejun...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi! First, sorry about my poor english =P
I'm
On Nov 8, 3:46 pm, richardson.balca...@gmail.com wrote:
I was just reading the effort of installing open web apps locally, I'm
assuming the strategy shift that I'm talking about is that Mozilla is betting
on Firefox as their application framework, that would make sense not to
support
4 matches
Mail list logo