Re: PSA: multipart/x-mixed-replace images will soon be restricted to MJPEG

2015-01-02 Thread Robert Kaiser
L. David Baron schrieb: On Friday 2015-01-02 14:23 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote: Seth Fowler schrieb: On Dec 17, 2014, at 10:08 PM, James May wrote: * Is there telemetry for this? There isn’t telemetry specifically for non-MJPEG usage of multipart/x-mixed-replace images. Given that I’ve nev

Re: PSA: multipart/x-mixed-replace images will soon be restricted to MJPEG

2015-01-02 Thread Johnny Stenback
I'd say this is far enough out towards extreme edge case land that we can be a bit more aggressive here compared to general feature removals. So agreed. On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Seth Fowler wrote: > >> On Jan 2, 2015, at 7:16 AM, L. David Baron wrote: >>> IMHO, "I haven't seen" is a weak

Re: PSA: multipart/x-mixed-replace images will soon be restricted to MJPEG

2015-01-02 Thread Seth Fowler
> On Jan 2, 2015, at 7:16 AM, L. David Baron wrote: >> IMHO, "I haven't seen" is a weak argument. When we remove features >> that are exposed to the web in some form, it's always a good idea to >> gather some telemetry first so that we know what the actual impact >> will probably be (there is som

Re: PSA: multipart/x-mixed-replace images will soon be restricted to MJPEG

2015-01-02 Thread L. David Baron
On Friday 2015-01-02 14:23 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote: > Seth Fowler schrieb: > > > >>On Dec 17, 2014, at 10:08 PM, James May wrote: > >>* Is there telemetry for this? > > > >There isn’t telemetry specifically for non-MJPEG usage of > >multipart/x-mixed-replace images. Given that I’ve never seen

Re: PSA: multipart/x-mixed-replace images will soon be restricted to MJPEG

2015-01-02 Thread Robert Kaiser
Seth Fowler schrieb: On Dec 17, 2014, at 10:08 PM, James May wrote: * Is there telemetry for this? There isn’t telemetry specifically for non-MJPEG usage of multipart/x-mixed-replace images. Given that I’ve never seen them used outside of our test suite, I don’t think we need telemetry to

Re: PSA: multipart/x-mixed-replace images will soon be restricted to MJPEG

2014-12-18 Thread Seth Fowler
> On Dec 17, 2014, at 10:08 PM, James May wrote: > * Is there telemetry for this? There isn’t telemetry specifically for non-MJPEG usage of multipart/x-mixed-replace images. Given that I’ve never seen them used outside of our test suite, I don’t think we need telemetry to make this particular

Re: PSA: multipart/x-mixed-replace images will soon be restricted to MJPEG

2014-12-17 Thread James May
On 17 December 2014 at 09:43, Seth Fowler wrote: > > Right now, ImageLib provides very general support for > multipart/x-mixed-replace images. Each part may contain a different image > format (we may even switch between raster and vector images from one part > to the next), individual parts may be

Re: PSA: multipart/x-mixed-replace images will soon be restricted to MJPEG

2014-12-17 Thread Robert O'Callahan
Hooray! Rob -- oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o oaonoyooonoeo owohooo osoaoyoso otooo oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro,o o‘oRoaoc

PSA: multipart/x-mixed-replace images will soon be restricted to MJPEG

2014-12-16 Thread Seth Fowler
Right now, ImageLib provides very general support for multipart/x-mixed-replace images. Each part may contain a different image format (we may even switch between raster and vector images from one part to the next), individual parts may be animated, and each part may have a different size. This