Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Verifiable Claims Working Group

2016-12-28 Thread L. David Baron
OK, I sent the response far enough before the deadline (which is Sunday January 15) that other W3C members may have a chance to see it before the deadline: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2016Dec/0010.html -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.or

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Verifiable Claims Working Group

2016-12-28 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 3:52 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > Here's an attempt to write up comments to submit on this charter. > I'm not sure I understood ekr's reply to mt, though. So corrections > and clarifications are certainly welcome. > > Sorry for the delay circling back to this. > > -David >

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Verifiable Claims Working Group

2016-12-28 Thread L. David Baron
Here's an attempt to write up comments to submit on this charter. I'm not sure I understood ekr's reply to mt, though. So corrections and clarifications are certainly welcome. Sorry for the delay circling back to this. -David We don't think the W3C should be putting resources behind standardiza

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Verifiable Claims Working Group

2016-12-12 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 5:56 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > Following up to myself: if the plan is really that people will have a > > single identity that they then present to everyone and that claims hang > > off, I think W3C should not sta

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Verifiable Claims Working Group

2016-12-12 Thread Martin Thomson
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 5:56 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > Following up to myself: if the plan is really that people will have a > single identity that they then present to everyone and that claims hang > off, I think W3C should not standardize that. A lot hinges on the nature of that identifier, bu

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Verifiable Claims Working Group

2016-12-12 Thread Eric Rescorla
Following up to myself: if the plan is really that people will have a single identity that they then present to everyone and that claims hang off, I think W3C should not standardize that. -Ekr On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > I took a quick look at this material and it's

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Verifiable Claims Working Group

2016-12-12 Thread Eric Rescorla
I took a quick look at this material and it's very hard to tell what the actual privacy properties are: "From a privacy perspective it is important that information that is intended to remain private is handled appropriately. Maintaining the trust of a verifiable claims ecosystem is important. Ver

Proposed W3C Charter: Verifiable Claims Working Group

2016-12-09 Thread L. David Baron
The W3C is proposing a new charter for: Verifiable Claims Working Group https://www.w3.org/2017/vc/charter https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2016Dec/0003.html Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through Sunday, January 15, 2017. Please reply to thi