Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Platform Working Group

2016-09-30 Thread L. David Baron
On Friday 2016-09-30 14:02 -0700, Tantek Çelik wrote: > Also, just found this in the charter: > announcement > Not really acceptable. I think it should link to the same URL as the other "(announcement)" link. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Platform Working Group

2016-09-30 Thread Tantek Çelik
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 12:51 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > On Thursday 2016-09-29 07:46 -0700, Tantek Çelik wrote: >> > Marked as deliverables to be taken up if incubation suggests likely >> > success: >> > Background Synchronisation; Filesystem API; FindText API; HTML Import;

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Platform Working Group

2016-09-30 Thread L. David Baron
On Thursday 2016-09-29 07:46 -0700, Tantek Çelik wrote: > > Marked as deliverables to be taken up if incubation suggests likely success: > > Background Synchronisation; Filesystem API; FindText API; HTML Import; > > Input Methods; Packaging; Quota API > > This section is confusing and weakly

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Platform Working Group

2016-09-29 Thread L. David Baron
On Thursday 2016-09-29 10:42 +0200, Ms2ger wrote: > On 29/09/16 03:02, L. David Baron wrote: > > The W3C is proposing a revised charter for: > > > > Web Platform Working Group (formerly Web Applications WG & HTML WG) > > https://www.w3.org/2016/08/web-platform-charter-draft.html > >

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Platform Working Group

2016-09-29 Thread Tantek Çelik
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 9/29/16 10:46 AM, Tantek Çelik wrote: >>> >>> New deliverables: >>>Microdata >> >> >> This should be dropped from the charter (FO). >> >> Ironic to see this since Firefox (release!) just dropped support for >>

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Platform Working Group

2016-09-29 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 9/29/16 11:21 AM, Tantek Çelik wrote: All of what was previously abandoned. The charter http://www.w3.org/2016/08/web-platform-charter-draft.html#deliverables links to the 2013 Microdata Note. I did see that it linked to the note. It wasn't clear whether that means "revive everything in

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Platform Working Group

2016-09-29 Thread Tantek Çelik
Note the major changes summary: https://www.w3.org/2016/08/web-platform-charter-draft.html#changes-from-wp1 This is my first pass review (already found problems). I may try to review in more depth to see what (if any) specific wording changes there are in the charter (is there a paragraph by

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Platform Working Group

2016-09-29 Thread Ms2ger
On 29/09/16 03:02, L. David Baron wrote: > The W3C is proposing a revised charter for: > > Web Platform Working Group (formerly Web Applications WG & HTML WG) > https://www.w3.org/2016/08/web-platform-charter-draft.html >

Proposed W3C Charter: Web Platform Working Group

2016-09-28 Thread L. David Baron
The W3C is proposing a revised charter for: Web Platform Working Group (formerly Web Applications WG & HTML WG) https://www.w3.org/2016/08/web-platform-charter-draft.html https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2016Sep/0001.html Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or