; Cheers,
> Robert
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Robert Strong [mailto:rstr...@mozilla.com]
>> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 2:07 AM
>> To: dev-platform
>> Subject: RE: Upcoming changes to Mac package layout, signing
>>
>> Quick status u
Robert Strong wrote on 10/01/2014 06:22 AM:
Hi Robert,
> If you find any bugs that you believe are due to these changes please file
> a new bug under toolkit -> application update and we'll take it from
> there.
Thanks for the update. Beside the crasher bug we found, and which has
been fixed we
From: Robert Strong [mailto:rstr...@mozilla.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 2:07 AM
> To: dev-platform
> Subject: RE: Upcoming changes to Mac package layout, signing
>
> Quick status update on the progress for Mac v2 signing.
>
> All of the major changes for Mac v2 signi
Robert Strong wrote on 09/22/2014 11:07 AM:
Hi Robert,
> All of the major changes for Mac v2 signing have landed on the Oak branch.
> This will allow us to test installing and updating before landing on
> mozilla-central.
[..]
>
> If no serious issues are found we are hoping to be able to land o
Quick status update on the progress for Mac v2 signing.
All of the major changes for Mac v2 signing have landed on the Oak branch.
This will allow us to test installing and updating before landing on
mozilla-central.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1046906
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org
On 8/28/14, 1:04 AM, Dave Townsend wrote:
If my reading of the patches are correct then the extension manager will
start looking in the new location in the app bundle for extensions
(Contents/Resources/browser/extensions) automatically. We'll have to
support this as that is where the default the
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Robert Strong wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Philipp Kewisch"
> > To: dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 4:49:35 PM
> > Subject: Re: Upcoming changes to Mac package
Strong
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 5:16 PM
To: dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
Subject: Re: Upcoming changes to Mac package layout, signing
- Original Message -
> From: "Philipp Kewisch"
> To: dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 4:49:
On 8/12/14, 1:05 PM, Ben Hearsum wrote:
Without any changes, future versions of Firefox will cease to function
out-of-the-box on OS X 10.9.5 and 10.10.
Will it still be possible to run old nightlies, presumably by changing
something in system settings?
-Boris
___
On 8/27/14, 8:16 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 8/12/14, 1:05 PM, Ben Hearsum wrote:
Without any changes, future versions of Firefox will cease to function
out-of-the-box on OS X 10.9.5 and 10.10.
Will it still be possible to run old nightlies, presumably by changing
something in system settings?
- Original Message -
> From: "Philipp Kewisch"
> To: dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 4:49:35 PM
> Subject: Re: Upcoming changes to Mac package layout, signing
>
> On 8/13/14 2:59 PM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
> >
On 8/13/14 2:59 PM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
>
> On 8/13/2014 3:34 AM, Philipp Kewisch wrote:
>>
>> Does this also affect binary extensions in any way? I'd imagine that
>> globally installed extensions would break signing if placed incorrectly.
>
> You cannot place anything in the Firefox bundle.
On 8/14/14, 5:02 AM, Neil wrote:
> Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
>
>> On 8/13/2014 3:34 AM, Philipp Kewisch wrote:
>>
>>> Does this also affect binary extensions in any way? I'd imagine that
>>> globally installed extensions would break signing if placed
>>> incorrectly.
>>
>> You cannot place anything
Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
On 8/13/2014 3:34 AM, Philipp Kewisch wrote:
Does this also affect binary extensions in any way? I'd imagine that
globally installed extensions would break signing if placed incorrectly.
You cannot place anything in the Firefox bundle. Any extensions,
binary or not,
On 14-08-12 08:46 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> Ben Hearsum wrote:
>> Apple recently announced changes to how OS X applications must be
>> packaged and signed
>
> Does this also apply if you run .app/Contents/MacOS/firefox binary
> manually rather than opening the .app?
I'm not sure about that.
On 8/13/2014 3:34 AM, Philipp Kewisch wrote:
Does this also affect binary extensions in any way? I'd imagine that
globally installed extensions would break signing if placed incorrectly.
You cannot place anything in the Firefox bundle. Any extensions, binary
or not, would need to be elsewher
On 8/12/14 7:05 PM, Ben Hearsum wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Apple recently announced changes to how OS X applications must be packaged
> and signed
> (https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/technotes/tn2206/_index.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/DTS40007919-CH1-TNTAG205)
> in order for them to function corr
On 8/12/14, 8:46 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> Ben Hearsum wrote:
>> Apple recently announced changes to how OS X applications must be
>> packaged and signed
>
> Does this also apply if you run .app/Contents/MacOS/firefox binary
> manually rather than opening the .app?
>
As best as I can tell, no.
: Upcoming changes to Mac package layout, signing
One thing to test heavily would be background updates which rely somewhat
on the structure of these files abd directories...
Cheers,
Ehsan
On Aug 12, 2014 1:05 PM, "Ben Hearsum" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Apple recently announced
Ben Hearsum wrote:
Apple recently announced changes to how OS X applications must be packaged and
signed
Does this also apply if you run .app/Contents/MacOS/firefox binary
manually rather than opening the .app?
If developers do update their OS to 10.9.5 when it's released, is there
a way t
One thing to test heavily would be background updates which rely somewhat
on the structure of these files abd directories...
Cheers,
Ehsan
On Aug 12, 2014 1:05 PM, "Ben Hearsum" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Apple recently announced changes to how OS X applications must be packaged
> and signed (
> https
Hi all,
Apple recently announced changes to how OS X applications must be packaged and
signed
(https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/technotes/tn2206/_index.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/DTS40007919-CH1-TNTAG205)
in order for them to function correctly on OS X 10.9.5 and 10.10. The tl;dr
version
22 matches
Mail list logo