Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Since (I presume) most everyone with an interest will be in MV next
> week for the corporate all-hands, can we get together at some point
> and figure out a path to landing the certificate validation hook for
> extensions (bug 644640)?
>
> Mon, Tue, and Fri are best for me.
Since (I presume) most everyone with an interest will be in MV next week
for the corporate all-hands, can we get together at some point and
figure out a path to landing the certificate validation hook for
extensions (bug 644640)?
Mon, Tue, and Fri are best for me.
zw
_
On 9/8/11 11:20 AM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> On 2011-09-08 10:57 AM, Daniel Veditz wrote:
>> Yes, OCSP supposedly traded off a little privacy for immediacy over
>> CRLs. Except that many OCSP deployments in practice just respond
>> based on the data in the CRL.
>
> Peter Gutmann posted a draft OCSP
On 9/6/11 8:46 AM, Walter do Valle wrote:
> I know that script. However, as I said in my original e-mail, it fell in
> some security issues. It's not possible to call this script without
> requesting some privileges. And that request generates an "ugly" dialog box
> asking user about permission. I
