Hi Sid,
Please find the answers inline.
thanks
Moheeb
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Sid Stamm wrote:
> Thanks for the info, Moheeb!
>
> On 06/15/2012 11:35 AM, moh...@google.com wrote:
>> Regarding the TLS bouncing idea.
>> As the reputation system derives features in part from the submitt
Homer Simpson: Kids: there's three ways to do things; the right way, the wrong
way and the Max Power way!
Bart: Isn't that the wrong way?
Homer Simpson: Yeah, but faster!
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Our weekly Security Engineering meeting is open to the Mozilla community and
will take place on Thursday J
On 6/20/2012 9:54 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
Are you aware of actual plans to allow A records for TLDs? I don't have
links to earlier discussion offhand, but I recall the consensus being
that that shouldn't be allowed at all.
Many of the ccTLDs already have them. I've mentioned "AI". That's
> Are you aware of actual plans to allow A records for TLDs? I don't have
> links to earlier discussion offhand, but I recall the consensus being
> that that shouldn't be allowed at all.
I wouldn't be surprised if disallowing that was one of the stipulations
for pressing ahead but the money may
On 2012-06-20 3:44 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
On 19/06/12 17:24, Zack Weinberg wrote:
Er, I'm confused. If I type "http://email/"; into my browser, you are
saying we should refuse to do a DNS query? How do I then reach my
intranet site? I'm fairly sure some intranet sites _only_ have a
single-wo
On 19/06/12 17:24, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> I think we do need our own DNS resolver eventually (mostly because
> DNSSEC) but it's not necessary for this. We'd just have to refuse to do
> the DNS query at all for URLs whose hostname component did not contain a
> dot, and/or which was equal to or a su
