Interesting experiment. We (the mozilla bounty evaluation team) have
paid, on a case by case basis, for vulnerabilities outside the mozilla
code for things affecting any dependencies we have for Firefox 3rd party
libraries, or our core development application or services websites for
some t
what others
think on that (I can also see the logic in the above order).
Matej
—
Matej Novak • Copywriter • Mozilla
+1.416.356.1926 • @matejnovak • matejnovak.com
On Thursday, 16 August, 2012 at 3:59 PM, chris hofmann wrote:
On 8/16/12 3:45 PM, Sid Stamm wrote:
I commented in the bug, but
On 8/16/12 3:45 PM, Sid Stamm wrote:
I commented in the bug, but I guess I should have commented here first.
Just because we have three states in the code doesn't nessisarily mean
we need three states in the UI.
I think the choices to the user remain the same.
Tell websites:
" * I do
On 8/16/12 12:51 PM, Asa Dotzler wrote:
On 8/16/2012 12:42 PM, Sid Stamm wrote:
Hey all,
Over in bug 765398 we've been discussing exposing a three-state DNT UI
to users so they have an opportunity to opt-out (as with the old UI) but
also opt-in to tracking.
Problem is that the words we use are
let's follow up the investigation for this in
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647219
its worth checking what versions of plugins you have installed since
most attacks against firefox are via plugins.
-chofmann
On 3/31/11 9:18 PM, jackalek wrote:
I've been infected by malware t
There is some early thinking about the Jetpack security model at
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Labs/Jetpack/JEP/29#Jetpack_Security_Model
There is still alot of work left to do in driving out details around how
the capabilities will be checked by knowledgable reviewers, and surfaced
to users that
