On 03/07/2014 07:10 AM, From spark0...@gmail.com:
According to Mozilla's definition of independent party, KISA is
independent organization from Sub-CAs(not employees nor director)
The minute a CA signs a certificate of/for another CA, it's not
independent at all. In fact a tight relationship
On 3/6/14, 9:58 AM, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
On 3/3/14, 10:33 AM, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
All,
I received the following question from an auditor, and would appreciate
hearing your opinions on it. This question is in regards to a new CA
inclusion request. New CAs are frequently not members of the
2014년 3월 11일 화요일 오전 8시 6분 55초 UTC+9, Eddy Nigg 님의 말:
On 03/07/2014 07:10 AM, From spark0...@gmail.com:
According to Mozilla's definition of independent party, KISA is
independent organization from Sub-CAs(not employees nor director)
The minute a CA signs a certificate of/for
On 3/10/14, 6:58 PM, spark0...@gmail.com wrote:
This might be a normal case for CA and Sub-CA in the business and that's why
I am mentioning Korea Electronic Signature Act.
I do understand why BR is requesting for 'independency' of the auditor, but
because KISA is designated by law to audit
4 matches
Mail list logo
