On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Daniel Cater via dev-security-policy <
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org> wrote:
> On Saturday, 4 March 2017 21:21:41 UTC, Jeremy Rowley wrote:
> > Common practice amongst certain cas. There were several cas that have
> always opposed cert validity periods
On Saturday, 4 March 2017 21:21:41 UTC, Jeremy Rowley wrote:
> Common practice amongst certain cas. There were several cas that have always
> opposed cert validity periods longer than three years. This opposition lead
> to the reducing the validity period first to 60 months then to 39 months.
Common practice amongst certain cas. There were several cas that have always
opposed cert validity periods longer than three years. This opposition lead to
the reducing the validity period first to 60 months then to 39 months.
> On Mar 4, 2017, at 2:01 PM, Peter Bowen via dev-security-policy
>
On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Daniel Cater via dev-security-policy
wrote:
> On Saturday, 4 March 2017 20:14:09 UTC, Jeremy Rowley wrote:
>> 1.0 is not the definitive version any more. As of 2015‐04‐01, Section
>> 6.3.2 prohibits validity periods longer
@lists.mozilla.org]
On Behalf Of Daniel Cater via dev-security-policy
Sent: Saturday, March 4, 2017 1:22 PM
To: mozilla-dev-security-pol...@lists.mozilla.org
Subject: Re: Maximum validity of pre-BR certificates
On Saturday, 4 March 2017 20:14:09 UTC, Jeremy Rowley wrote:
> 1.0 is not the definitive vers
On Saturday, 4 March 2017 20:14:09 UTC, Jeremy Rowley wrote:
> 1.0 is not the definitive version any more. As of 2015‐04‐01, Section
> 6.3.2 prohibits validity periods longer than 39 months.
>
Thanks for the prompt reply Jeremy. I realise this. My question relates to what
the situation was
1.0 is not the definitive version any more. As of 2015‐04‐01, Section
6.3.2 prohibits validity periods longer than 39 months.
-Original Message-
From: dev-security-policy
[mailto:dev-security-policy-bounces+jeremy.rowley=digicert.com@lists.mozilla
.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Cater via
7 matches
Mail list logo