On Saturday, April 22, 2017 at 5:25:35 AM UTC-7, wangs...@gmail.com wrote:
> We have a question about completing the BR self assessment,
> is it necessary that all the BRs requirements appear in
> relevant sections of the CP/CPS?
It is OK if the information is in different sections in the
在 2017年4月4日星期二 UTC+8上午1:47:34，Kathleen Wilson写道：
> I updated https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:BRs-Self-Assessment to add a section
> called 'Annual BR Self Assessment', which states:
> "CAs with included root certificates that have the Websites trust bit set
> must do an annual self-assessment of
I updated https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:BRs-Self-Assessment to add a section
called 'Annual BR Self Assessment', which states:
"CAs with included root certificates that have the Websites trust bit set must
do an annual self-assessment of their compliance with the BRs, and must update
their CP
On Wednesday, March 29, 2017 at 2:00:05 PM UTC-7, Jeremy Rowley wrote:
> ...
> An extension on this could be to have CAs annually file an updated mapping
> with their WebTrust audit. That way it's a reminder that the CA needs to
> notify Mozilla of changes in their process and keeps the CAs
, 2017 11:55 AM
To: mozilla-dev-security-pol...@lists.mozilla.org
Subject: DRAFT - BR Self Assessments
All,
As mentioned in the GDCA discussion[1], I would like to add a step to
Mozilla's CA Inclusion/Update Request Process[2] in which the CA performs a
self-assessment about their compliance
All,
As mentioned in the GDCA discussion[1], I would like to add a step to Mozilla's
CA Inclusion/Update Request Process[2] in which the CA performs a
self-assessment about their compliance with the CA/Browser Forum's Baseline
Requirements.
A draft of this new step is here:
6 matches
Mail list logo
