El martes, 19 de enero de 2021 a las 14:32:19 UTC+1, paul.leo@gmail.com
escribió:
> On Tuesday, January 19, 2021 at 11:01:15 AM UTC+1, Ramiro Muñoz wrote:
>
> > Finally, I’d like to ask you, based on which article of Mozilla Root Store
> > Policy, you are sentencing a removal from the
On Tuesday, January 19, 2021 at 11:01:15 AM UTC+1, Ramiro Muñoz wrote:
> Finally, I’d like to ask you, based on which article of Mozilla Root Store
> Policy, you are sentencing a removal from the Mozilla store.
Oh, I know this one: It is in the Mozilla Root Store Policy, 7.3: "Mozilla MAY,
at
On 2021-01-19 11:02, Ramiro Muñoz wrote:
El martes, 19 de enero de 2021 a las 0:49:42 UTC+1, Matt Palmer escribió:
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 12:51:29AM -0800, Ramiro Muñoz via dev-security-policy
wrote:
We don’t ask the community to disregard the data, on the contrary we ask
the community to
Forwarded Message
Subject: Summary of January 2021 Audit Reminder Emails
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 20:00:30 + (GMT)
Mozilla: Audit Reminder
CA Owner: Krajowa Izba Rozliczeniowa S.A. (KIR)
Root Certificates:
SZAFIR ROOT CA2
Standard Audit:
On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 00:51:29 -0800 (PST)
Ramiro Mu__oz via dev-security-policy
wrote:
> Some certificates may have been syntactically
> incorrect due to misinterpretation, but we have never compromised any
> vetting, identification or information validation.
This is false, as shown by incidents
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 6:37 PM Jonathan Rudenberg via
dev-security-policy wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021, at 12:01, Andrew Ayer via dev-security-policy wrote:
> > Camerfirma was warned in 2018 that trust in their CA was in jeopardy,
> > yet compliance problems continued. There is no reason to
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021, at 12:01, Andrew Ayer via dev-security-policy wrote:
> Camerfirma was warned in 2018 that trust in their CA was in jeopardy,
> yet compliance problems continued. There is no reason to believe
> Camerfirma will improve, and there are many indications that they won't.
>
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 07:28:17AM -0800, Ramiro Muñoz via dev-security-policy
wrote:
> Camerfirma is not the member with the highest number of
> incidents nor the member with the most severe ones.
No, but Camerfirma's got a pretty shocking history of poor incident
response, over an extended
El martes, 19 de enero de 2021 a las 0:49:42 UTC+1, Matt Palmer escribió:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 12:51:29AM -0800, Ramiro Muñoz via
> dev-security-policy wrote:
> > We don’t ask the community to disregard the data, on the contrary we ask
> > the community to analyze the data thoroughly
El martes, 19 de enero de 2021 a las 0:49:42 UTC+1, Matt Palmer escribió:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 12:51:29AM -0800, Ramiro Muñoz via
> dev-security-policy wrote:
> > We don’t ask the community to disregard the data, on the contrary we ask
> > the community to analyze the data thoroughly
10 matches
Mail list logo
