Dear all,
Still posting on behalf of TÜViT.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 11:43 AM Wiedenhorst, Matthias via dev-security-policy
mailto:dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org>>
wrote:
· Since January 2018, T-Systems issued EV certificates with an
incorrect qcStatement. T-Systems wa
Thanks for focussing the discussion on the substance and thus allowing the
community moving towards a common understanding and towards defining adequate
requirements for treating such kind of incidents. We are very much interested
in improving the existing requirements as we have done in the
Dear all,
with regard to the findings listed in the different audit attestations, we
would like to clarify that
- all non-conformities have been resolved in a timely manner
- the resolution has been audited by and proven to the certification body
In addition, we would like to
CA. That's not really sustainable, nor is it in line
with the purpose and goal of audits themselves, at least as practiced by
Mozilla since the first version of the root policy.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:45 AM Wiedenhorst, Matthias via dev-security-policy
<mailto:dev-security-policy@lists.mozil
Hi everybody,
this might not be closely connected to original topic, but allow me to comment
on one issue below.
Best regards
Matthias
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: dev-security-policy Im
> Auftrag von Ryan Sleevi via dev-security-policy
> Gesendet: Samstag, 17. Oktober 2020
Hi Ben, Hi all,
sorry for the late reply. Thanks to your summary yesterday, I re-checked all
the open issues and stumbled upon one question with regard to this issue that
didn't came to my mind earlier.
I am not sure if I am understanding correctly the desired outcome of this
change. Forgive
6 matches
Mail list logo
