Seems generally doable, but probably more than I want to chew right now.
I'll get an issue filed though.
Does anyone object to landing the synchronous font loading as a stopgap to
get better reftest coverage until we make the font loading logic smarter?
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Bobby Holle
That's a great point - I'll take a look to see how doable it is.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 7:28 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
> On Wednesday 2015-11-04 19:16 -0800, Bobby Holley wrote:
> > Right now, every wpt test includes a stylesheet with an @font-face rule
> to
> > make the 'ahem' font available to
On Wednesday 2015-11-04 19:16 -0800, Bobby Holley wrote:
> Right now, every wpt test includes a stylesheet with an @font-face rule to
> make the 'ahem' font available to tests. Since font loading triggers a
> document-wide reflow, we end up with a non-deterministic network-driven
> reflow in each a
Right now, every wpt test includes a stylesheet with an @font-face rule to
make the 'ahem' font available to tests. Since font loading triggers a
document-wide reflow, we end up with a non-deterministic network-driven
reflow in each and every test, which makes it harder to test layout
optimizations
4 matches
Mail list logo
