Dave Pinn wrote:
> I need to clarify something: there are two states in which I can have my
> notebook (the one with the TPM):
>
> 1. Certificates directly (via ProtectTools import function) and fully
> (the icons indicate that private keys are available) imported into the
> TPM. This is the state
Peter Djalaliev wrote:
> Nelson Bolyard wrote:
>
>> You generated the key pair on a PC that didn't have the TPM chip.
>> So the private key couldn't have been generated in the TPM chip,
>> and when you generated it, mozilla (FF/TB/SM) didn't ask you which
>> device you wanted to use to generate th
Peter Djalaliev wrote:
> ftp://ftp.compaq.com/pub/products/security/embedded_security_-_implementation.pdf
>
> ...and as the ProtectTools implementation white-paper explains, their
> Embeded Security Manager uses the TPM to create wrapping keys, which
> are then used to encrypt the private keys of
Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
> On a related topic, perhaps you can speak to whether Verisign still considers
> Alex Deacon's bug report https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=234129
> to be an issue?
I spoke with Alex this morning and yes he feels that this is still a bug and
should be fixed.
Thanks for doing some research on this, Peter. I am comforted by the
participation of several dedicated and generous souls in the
investigation of this problem.
It is currently 9:20 pm here in Sydney; I will attempt to contact a
techie at HP tomorrow, to see if I can get some answers.
I post
ftp://ftp.compaq.com/pub/products/security/embedded_security_-_implementation.pdf
...and as the ProtectTools implementation white-paper explains, their
Embeded Security Manager uses the TPM to create wrapping keys, which
are then used to encrypt the private keys of the user. The wrapped
keys are
More information on how the TPM enables protected storage can be found
starting on p. 145 of the TCPA specification (v. 1.1):
https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/specs/TPM/TCPA_Main_TCG_Architecture_v1_1b.pdf
Regards,
Peter
___
dev-tech-crypto mailin
More information on how the TPM enables protected storage can be found
starting on p. 145 of the TCPA specification (v. 1.1):
https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/specs/TPM/TCPA_Main_TCG_Architecture_v1_1b.pdf
Regards,
Peter
___
dev-tech-crypto mailin
Nelson Bolyard wrote:
> You generated the key pair on a PC that didn't have the TPM chip.
> So the private key couldn't have been generated in the TPM chip,
> and when you generated it, mozilla (FF/TB/SM) didn't ask you which
> device you wanted to use to generate the keypair because, on that
> m
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.
C:\>certutil -L -h "Embedded Security Chip" -d X:/ThunderbirdProfile
Enter Password or Pin for "Embedded Security Chip":
Embedded Security Chip:David Michael Pinn's eSign Australia ID u,u,u
Embedded Security Chip:Davi
Dave Pinn wrote:
> I need to clarify something: there are two states in which I can have my
> notebook (the one with the TPM):
>
> 1. Certificates directly (via ProtectTools import function) and fully
> (the icons indicate that private keys are available) imported into the
> TPM. This is the state
I need to clarify something: there are two states in which I can have my
notebook (the one with the TPM):
1. Certificates directly (via ProtectTools import function) and fully
(the icons indicate that private keys are available) imported into the
TPM. This is the state in which I found my mach
12 matches
Mail list logo
