Matthews, Tim R wrote, On 2008-10-06 05:50:
>> Now, about that diagnostic step, please try the following series of certutil
>> commands using the same cert DB that you used in your original
>
> trmatthe@:~/working$ certutil -d . -M -t ",," -n client
> trmatthe@:~/working$ certutil -d . -M -t "C,,
I'll assume he meant Microsec instead of Microsoft, and work from
there. (bug 370505)
-Kyle H
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Eddy Nigg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/06/2008 11:30 PM, Frank Hecker:
>>
>> We can consider this in the longer term. In the short term Kálmán
>> Kéménczy of the Mo
On 10/06/2008 11:30 PM, Frank Hecker:
>
> We can consider this in the longer term. In the short term Kálmán
> Kéménczy of the Mozilla localization team for Hungary has confirmed the
> accuracy of the translations in the Microsoft bug, and is willing to
> check further translations as needed.
>
Fra
Eddy Nigg wrote:
> On 10/03/2008 12:43 AM, Frank Hecker:
>> * This CA is based in Hungary. Though it provides a lot of information
>> in English (including a helpful CA hierarchy diagram) unfortunately all
>> of its CPS documents are currently available in Hungarian only.
>
> Frank, I think we sho
On 6 okt 2008, at 21.14, Julien R Pierre - Sun Microsystems wrote:
> SSLsample is outdated code and has been removed from the NSS source
> tree
> in 3.12.1. See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359302
> Please use selfserv as a server code sample.
Excellent and thanks for the heads
Claes,
Claes Jakobsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm writing a test-case for the Perl bindings that basically is just
> server from SSLsample. However when I try to connect to it I get an
> assertation failure: PR_Assert (s=0x86d2c "numPresent > 0 || numEnabled
> == 0", file=0x86ced "ssl3con.c", ln=670
Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
> István Zsolt BERTA wrote, On 2008-10-06 06:54:
>> We had good reasons to choose this solution. According to Hungarian
>> regulations, a qualified CA is allowed to use its private key for the
>> following two purposes only:
>> * signing qualified end-user certificates and
2008/10/6 Kai Engert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
>>
>> - The password must be at least seven characters long.
>> - The password must consist of characters from three or more character
>> classes (uppercase, lowercase, digits, etc.).
>>
>
>
> NSS rejects abcDEF7 although it matches
On 10/06/2008 03:54 PM, István Zsolt BERTA:
> We support the second option (Trusted Responder), where the requester
> explicitly trusts the OCSP responder. (In our case the link of trust
> is established by our CPS stating the the separate root can be trusted
> for signing relevant OCSP responses.)
Concerning translation tools this search brought me to some
possibilities:
http://www.google.com/search?q=translate+hungarian+english&sourceid=navclient-ff&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1B3GGGL_enIL280IL280&aq=t
--
Regards
Signer: Eddy Nigg, StartCom Ltd.
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: https://blog.startcom
Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
- The password must be at least seven characters long.
- The password must consist of characters from three or more character
classes (uppercase, lowercase, digits, etc.).
NSS rejects abcDEF7 although it matches your above description.
Kai
smime.p7s
Description: S
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 11:11 PM, Subrata Mazumdar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using Firefox 3.0.3. I have FIPS enabled the software security
> device using "Secuirty Devices" dialog window in PSM.
> This step forced me to add password protect the internal Key token
> (Software security
István Zsolt BERTA wrote, On 2008-10-06 06:54:
> OCSP:
> -
> According to section 2 of RFC 2560, there are three ways to operate an
> OCSP responder:
> "
>All definitive response messages SHALL be digitally signed. The key
>used to sign the response MUST belong to one of the following:
Kai Engert wrote:
Subrata Mazumdar wrote:
I am using Firefox 3.0.3. I have FIPS enabled the software security
device using "Secuirty Devices" dialog window in PSM.
This step forced me to add password protect the internal Key token
(Software security device).
Then, I tried to change the password
Subrata Mazumdar wrote:
I am using Firefox 3.0.3. I have FIPS enabled the software security
device using "Secuirty Devices" dialog window in PSM.
This step forced me to add password protect the internal Key token
(Software security device).
Then, I tried to change the password of the "internal k
Dear All,
Let me reflect to some of the above points.
First of all, our public website is www.e-szigno.hu.
The webpage at https://srv.e-szigno.hu:/cgi-bin/editugyvedcsv.cgi
is a restricted page, it requires a client-side SSL certificate (with
certain values in the subject DN), so you should n
Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
> Frank Hecker wrote, On 2008-10-02 14:43:
>> In accordance with the schedule at
>>
>>https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:Schedule
Hi Nelson, Hi Frank,
Having read the EU directive at length, here are some perspectives.
I have not looked at the CA's request in question.
(I
Hi. Apologies for the poor use of client/server terminology. I've spent so long
talking about the non-SSL part of this that I didn't do the context switch into
SSL terms :)
You are right in that no client certificates are in use. In testing I just have
the CA cert and the LDAPS server cert.
>
On Monday 06 October 2008 08:53:01 Rob Stradling wrote:
> IINM, FF3 by default has the "When an OCSP connection fails, treat the
> certificate as invalid" tickbox set to *disabled*, meaning that most users
> won't see browser warnings. Therefore, IMHO, if Microsec don't think it's a
> problem, th
Frank Hecker wrote, On 2008-10-02 14:43:
> In accordance with the schedule at
>
>https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:Schedule
>
> I am now opening the first public discussion period for a request from
> Microtec Ltd to add the Microsec e-Szigno Root CA root certificate to
> Mozilla. This is bug 370
On Thursday 02 October 2008 22:43:02 Frank Hecker wrote:
> * Microsec has a separate root used for OCSP, and apparently does not
> offer OCSP as a general public service; please see the comments in the
> bug. I'd like those of you who are OCSP experts to look at this issue
> and tell us if you see
21 matches
Mail list logo
